NJUN vs. PQOC
NJUN (Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - June) and PQOC (PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NJUN returned 13.44% vs 20.56% for PQOC. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NJUN charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PQOC.
Performance
NJUN vs. PQOC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NJUN achieves a 4.16% return, which is significantly lower than PQOC's 9.01% return.
NJUN
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 4.16%
- 6M
- 4.26%
- 1Y
- 13.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PQOC
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 9.01%
- 6M
- 8.83%
- 1Y
- 20.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NJUN vs. PQOC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NJUN Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - June | 4.16% | 15.75% |
PQOC PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October | 9.01% | 14.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between NJUN and PQOC is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2025 | 0.93 |
The correlation between NJUN and PQOC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NJUN vs. PQOC — Risk / Return Rank
NJUN
PQOC
NJUN vs. PQOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - June (NJUN) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October (PQOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NJUN | PQOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.46 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.71 | 3.09 | +0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.76 | 13.95 | +4.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NJUN vs. PQOC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NJUN drawdown since its inception was -12.59%, smaller than the maximum PQOC drawdown of -13.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NJUN and PQOC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NJUN | PQOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.59% | -13.71% | +1.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.63% | -6.68% | +3.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -0.16% | -0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.08% | -1.58% | +0.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.72% | 1.48% | -0.76% |
Volatility
NJUN vs. PQOC - Volatility Comparison
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - June (NJUN) has a higher volatility of 4.18% compared to PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October (PQOC) at 2.46%. This indicates that NJUN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PQOC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NJUN | PQOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.18% | 2.46% | +1.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.91% | 6.95% | -1.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.06% | 8.78% | -1.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.87% | 12.86% | -1.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.87% | 12.86% | -1.99% |
NJUN vs. PQOC - Expense Ratio Comparison
NJUN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PQOC's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
NJUN vs. PQOC - Dividend Comparison
Neither NJUN nor PQOC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, NJUN and PQOC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
NJUN has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to PQOC (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NJUN dropped -12.59% vs PQOC's -13.71%.
On 1-year performance, PQOC leads with 20.56% vs 13.44% for NJUN. On fees, PQOC is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, PQOC has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PQOC has performed better with a 20.56% return vs 13.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PQOC is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for NJUN.
NJUN and PQOC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for NJUN and 0.50% for PQOC.
PQOC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NJUN and PQOC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer