PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NJUN vs. MSOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NJUN vs. MSOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - June (NJUN) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF (MSOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NJUN achieves a 4.16% return, which is significantly higher than MSOO's -26.25% return.


NJUN

1D
-0.18%
1M
-0.18%
YTD
4.16%
6M
4.26%
1Y
13.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSOO

1D
0.00%
1M
-23.48%
YTD
-26.25%
6M
-32.17%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NJUN vs. MSOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NJUN and MSOO is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2025

0.51

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NJUN vs. MSOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NJUN
NJUN Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
NJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
NJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
NJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
NJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

MSOO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NJUN vs. MSOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - June (NJUN) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF (MSOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NJUNMSOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.76

NJUN vs. MSOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NJUN vs. MSOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NJUN drawdown since its inception was -12.59%, smaller than the maximum MSOO drawdown of -73.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NJUN and MSOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NJUNMSOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.59%

-73.17%

+60.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-71.52%

+70.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.08%

-49.30%

+48.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.72%

Volatility

NJUN vs. MSOO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NJUNMSOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.06%

69.26%

-62.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.87%

69.26%

-58.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.87%

69.26%

-58.39%

NJUN vs. MSOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

NJUN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than MSOO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

NJUN vs. MSOO - Dividend Comparison

NJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NJUN and MSOO have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MSOO is cheaper at 0.78% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MSOO is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for NJUN.

MSOO has the higher dividend yield at 2.20%, compared with 0.00% for NJUN.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for NJUN and 0.78% for MSOO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NJUN and MSOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer