PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NJTFX vs. GUIRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NJTFX vs. GUIRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price New Jersey Tax Free Bond Fund (NJTFX) and Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class (GUIRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NJTFX achieves a 2.03% return, which is significantly higher than GUIRX's 1.77% return. Over the past 10 years, NJTFX has underperformed GUIRX with an annualized return of 2.38%, while GUIRX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.66% annualized return.


NJTFX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.62%
YTD
2.03%
6M
2.72%
1Y
9.01%
3Y*
4.77%
5Y*
1.57%
10Y*
2.38%

GUIRX

1D
-0.07%
1M
1.37%
YTD
1.77%
6M
2.22%
1Y
6.21%
3Y*
4.59%
5Y*
1.33%
10Y*
2.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NJTFX vs. GUIRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NJTFX
T. Rowe Price New Jersey Tax Free Bond Fund
2.03%5.00%4.01%7.17%-10.24%2.67%4.73%6.65%1.31%5.30%
GUIRX
Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class
1.77%4.73%3.66%6.37%-9.66%3.11%3.86%7.80%3.09%5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between NJTFX and GUIRX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2011

0.81

The correlation between NJTFX and GUIRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NJTFX vs. GUIRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NJTFX
NJTFX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
NJTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NJTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
NJTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
NJTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
NJTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

GUIRX
GUIRX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
GUIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
GUIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NJTFX vs. GUIRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price New Jersey Tax Free Bond Fund (NJTFX) and Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class (GUIRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NJTFXGUIRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.89

1.66

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.45

2.52

+0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.05

8.79

+4.26

NJTFX vs. GUIRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NJTFX Sharpe Ratio is 3.36, which is higher than the GUIRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NJTFX and GUIRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NJTFX vs. GUIRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NJTFX drawdown since its inception was -15.19%, which is greater than GUIRX's maximum drawdown of -14.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NJTFX and GUIRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NJTFXGUIRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.19%

-14.21%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.59%

-2.46%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.69%

-5.33%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.19%

-14.16%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.19%

-14.21%

-0.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-0.16%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.81%

-2.11%

+0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.68%

0.70%

-0.02%

Volatility

NJTFX vs. GUIRX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price New Jersey Tax Free Bond Fund (NJTFX) has a higher volatility of 0.71% compared to Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class (GUIRX) at 0.67%. This indicates that NJTFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GUIRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NJTFXGUIRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.71%

0.67%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.96%

1.81%

+0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66%

2.42%

+0.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.99%

3.71%

+0.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.86%

3.94%

-0.08%

NJTFX vs. GUIRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NJTFX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than GUIRX's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

NJTFX vs. GUIRX - Dividend Comparison

NJTFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, more than GUIRX's 3.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GUIRX
Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class
3.74%4.90%3.86%2.78%2.06%2.16%2.38%2.84%3.04%3.23%3.60%3.68%
NJTFX
T. Rowe Price New Jersey Tax Free Bond Fund
4.44%4.44%4.27%3.27%2.03%2.56%2.79%2.84%3.13%3.13%3.26%3.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


NJTFX and GUIRX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NJTFX has higher volatility (0.71%) compared to GUIRX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NJTFX dropped -15.19% vs GUIRX's -14.21%.

NJTFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.36 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NJTFX and GUIRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer