NJNK vs. LDRH

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia U.S. High Yield ETF (NJNK) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH).

NJNK and LDRH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NJNK is an actively managed fund by Columbia. It was launched on Sep 5, 2024. LDRH is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the BlackRock iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder Index. It was launched on Nov 7, 2024.

Performance

NJNK vs. LDRH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia U.S. High Yield ETF (NJNK) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NJNK vs. LDRH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NJNK Columbia U.S. High Yield ETF	-0.36%	9.03%	-0.50%
LDRH iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF	0.66%	7.18%	0.21%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NJNK achieves a -0.36% return, which is significantly lower than LDRH's 0.66% return.

NJNK

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -0.72%
• YTD: -0.36%
• 6M: 1.20%
• 1Y: 7.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LDRH

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 0.25%
• YTD: 0.66%
• 6M: 1.72%
• 1Y: 6.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NJNK vs. LDRH - Expense Ratio Comparison

NJNK has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than LDRH's 0.35% expense ratio.

NJNK

Columbia U.S. High Yield ETF

LDRH

iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF

Return for Risk

NJNK vs. LDRH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NJNK

NJNK Risk / Return Rank: 73
NJNK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
NJNK Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
NJNK Omega Ratio Rank: 75
NJNK Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
NJNK Martin Ratio Rank: 78

LDRH

LDRH Risk / Return Rank: 87
LDRH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
LDRH Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
LDRH Omega Ratio Rank: 91
LDRH Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
LDRH Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NJNK vs. LDRH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia U.S. High Yield ETF (NJNK) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NJNK	LDRH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	1.71	-0.35
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.03	2.63	-0.59
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.41	-0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.96	2.39	-0.43
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.57	14.61	-5.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NJNK vs. LDRH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NJNK Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the LDRH Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NJNK and LDRH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NJNK	LDRH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.36	1.71	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.22	1.61	-0.40

Correlation

The correlation between NJNK and LDRH is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

NJNK vs. LDRH - Dividend Comparison

NJNK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.37%, less than LDRH's 6.98% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
NJNK Columbia U.S. High Yield ETF	6.37%	6.34%	2.05%
LDRH iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF	6.98%	6.41%	1.13%

Drawdowns

NJNK vs. LDRH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NJNK drawdown since its inception was -4.48%, which is greater than LDRH's maximum drawdown of -3.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NJNK and LDRH.

Drawdown Indicators

	NJNK	LDRH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.48%	-3.17%	-1.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.83%	-2.82%	-1.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.23%	-0.32%	-0.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.50%	-0.25%	-0.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.79%	0.46%	+0.33%

Volatility

NJNK vs. LDRH - Volatility Comparison

Columbia U.S. High Yield ETF (NJNK) has a higher volatility of 2.08% compared to iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH) at 1.34%. This indicates that NJNK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDRH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NJNK	LDRH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.08%	1.34%	+0.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.07%	2.04%	+1.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.38%	3.89%	+1.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.84%	3.62%	+1.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.84%	3.62%	+1.22%