NJAN vs. EAPR
Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - January (NJAN) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR).
NJAN and EAPR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NJAN is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Dec 31, 2019. EAPR is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets. It was launched on Mar 31, 2021. Both NJAN and EAPR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
NJAN vs. EAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NJAN vs. EAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NJAN Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - January | -1.86% | 14.20% | 15.35% | 20.95% | -18.92% | 8.53% |
EAPR Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April | 1.70% | 14.80% | 2.86% | 8.19% | -5.01% | -2.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NJAN achieves a -1.86% return, which is significantly lower than EAPR's 1.70% return.
NJAN
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -1.16%
- YTD
- -1.86%
- 6M
- 1.14%
- 1Y
- 15.05%
- 3Y*
- 12.44%
- 5Y*
- 6.59%
- 10Y*
- —
EAPR
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 1.70%
- 6M
- 3.32%
- 1Y
- 13.70%
- 3Y*
- 7.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NJAN vs. EAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
NJAN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than EAPR's 0.89% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NJAN vs. EAPR — Risk / Return Rank
NJAN
EAPR
NJAN vs. EAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - January (NJAN) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NJAN | EAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.21 | 1.72 | -0.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.86 | 2.55 | -0.69 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.49 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | 1.98 | -0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.66 | 14.72 | -5.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NJAN | EAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21 | 1.72 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.38 | +0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between NJAN and EAPR is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
NJAN vs. EAPR - Dividend Comparison
Neither NJAN nor EAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
NJAN vs. EAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NJAN drawdown since its inception was -20.70%, which is greater than EAPR's maximum drawdown of -17.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NJAN and EAPR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NJAN | EAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.70% | -17.65% | -3.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.90% | -6.09% | +0.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.34% | -0.84% | -2.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.91% | -4.18% | +0.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.63% | 0.94% | +0.69% |
Volatility
NJAN vs. EAPR - Volatility Comparison
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - January (NJAN) has a higher volatility of 3.73% compared to Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR) at 2.45%. This indicates that NJAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NJAN | EAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.73% | 2.45% | +1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.80% | 3.19% | +2.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.53% | 8.00% | +4.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.34% | 9.85% | +2.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.06% | 9.85% | +3.21% |