NIO vs. 1810.HK

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

NIO (NIO Inc.) and 1810.HK (Xiaomi Corp) are both stocks. NIO operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical), while 1810.HK operates in Consumer Electronics (Technology). Over the past 5 years, NIO returned -35.22%/yr vs -1.61%/yr for 1810.HK. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

NIO vs. 1810.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NIO Inc. (NIO) and Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

NIO is traded in USD, while 1810.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 1810.HK values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NIO achieves a 2.16% return, which is significantly higher than 1810.HK's -33.78% return.

NIO

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: -20.34%
• YTD: 2.16%
• 6M: 3.58%
• 1Y: 43.92%
• 3Y*: -16.32%
• 5Y*: -35.22%
• 10Y*: —

1810.HK

• 1D: 1.41%
• 1M: -17.66%
• YTD: -33.78%
• 6M: -39.41%
• 1Y: -49.72%
• 3Y*: 33.78%
• 5Y*: -1.61%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NIO vs. 1810.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
NIO NIO Inc.	2.16%	16.97%	-51.93%	-6.97%	-69.22%	-35.00%	1,112.44%	-36.89%	6.17%
1810.HK Xiaomi Corp	-33.78%	13.72%	122.28%	42.62%	-42.22%	-43.13%	208.09%	-16.13%	-19.66%

Correlation

The correlation between NIO and 1810.HK is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2018	0.23

Return for Risk

NIO vs. 1810.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NIO

NIO Risk / Return Rank: 64
NIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
NIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
NIO Omega Ratio Rank: 61
NIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
NIO Martin Ratio Rank: 60

1810.HK

1810.HK Risk / Return Rank: 4
1810.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
1810.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
1810.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 3
1810.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
1810.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NIO vs. 1810.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NIO Inc. (NIO) and Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NIO	1810.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.70	-1.43	+2.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.43	-2.36	+3.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	0.74	+0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.01	-0.89	+1.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.78	-1.51	+3.30

NIO vs. 1810.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NIO Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is higher than the 1810.HK Sharpe Ratio of -1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NIO and 1810.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NIO vs. 1810.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NIO drawdown since its inception was -95.00%, which is greater than 1810.HK's maximum drawdown of -76.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NIO and 1810.HK.

Drawdown Indicators

	NIO	1810.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.00%	-76.36%	-18.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-43.73%	-56.97%	+13.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-79.69%	-56.97%	-22.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-94.10%	-70.98%	-23.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-91.71%	-56.36%	-35.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-67.90%	-42.10%	-25.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.74%	32.95%	-8.21%

Volatility

NIO vs. 1810.HK - Volatility Comparison

NIO Inc. (NIO) has a higher volatility of 17.58% compared to Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK) at 8.98%. This indicates that NIO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 1810.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NIO	1810.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.58%	8.98%	+8.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.08%	26.23%	+14.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	62.74%	35.45%	+27.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	71.62%	44.22%	+27.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	86.66%	45.80%	+40.86%

Dividends

NIO vs. 1810.HK - Dividend Comparison

Neither NIO nor 1810.HK has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NIO and 1810.HK in my portfolio?

NIO and 1810.HK have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.