NIO vs. ^GSPC
NIO (NIO Inc.) is a stock, while ^GSPC (S&P 500 Index) is an index. Over the past 5 years, NIO returned -35.22%/yr vs 11.84%/yr for ^GSPC. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NIO vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NIO achieves a 2.16% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 8.56% return.
NIO
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -20.34%
- YTD
- 2.16%
- 6M
- 3.58%
- 1Y
- 43.92%
- 3Y*
- -16.32%
- 5Y*
- -35.22%
- 10Y*
- —
^GSPC
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 6M
- 8.85%
- 1Y
- 22.93%
- 3Y*
- 19.37%
- 5Y*
- 11.84%
- 10Y*
- 13.61%
NIO vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NIO NIO Inc. | 2.16% | 16.97% | -51.93% | -6.97% | -69.22% | -35.00% | 1,112.44% | -36.89% | 6.17% |
^GSPC S&P 500 Index | 8.56% | 16.39% | 23.31% | 24.23% | -19.44% | 26.89% | 16.26% | 28.88% | -13.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between NIO and ^GSPC is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2018 | 0.37 |
The correlation between NIO and ^GSPC shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NIO vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank
NIO
^GSPC
NIO vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NIO Inc. (NIO) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NIO | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.34 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.01 | 2.53 | -1.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.78 | 11.37 | -9.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NIO vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NIO drawdown since its inception was -95.00%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NIO and ^GSPC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NIO | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.00% | -56.78% | -38.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.73% | -9.10% | -34.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -79.69% | -18.90% | -60.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.10% | -25.43% | -68.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.71% | -2.34% | -89.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.90% | -10.72% | -57.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.74% | 2.02% | +22.72% |
Volatility
NIO vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison
NIO Inc. (NIO) has a higher volatility of 17.58% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 4.43%. This indicates that NIO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NIO | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.58% | 4.43% | +13.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.08% | 9.70% | +31.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.74% | 12.38% | +50.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.62% | 16.97% | +54.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 86.66% | 18.09% | +68.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NIO and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NIO has higher volatility (17.58%) compared to ^GSPC (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NIO dropped -95.00% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.
^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NIO and ^GSPC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer