PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NINDX vs. FZROX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NINDX vs. FZROX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Large Cap Index Fund (NINDX) and Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NINDX having a 11.64% return and FZROX slightly higher at 12.01%.


NINDX

1D
0.13%
1M
5.79%
YTD
11.64%
6M
11.78%
1Y
28.73%
3Y*
22.54%
5Y*
14.15%
10Y*
15.43%

FZROX

1D
0.23%
1M
5.79%
YTD
12.01%
6M
11.92%
1Y
29.16%
3Y*
22.49%
5Y*
13.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NINDX vs. FZROX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
NINDX
Columbia Large Cap Index Fund
11.64%17.56%24.83%26.09%-18.11%28.62%18.10%31.36%-11.19%
FZROX
Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund
12.01%17.23%23.94%26.20%-19.21%26.00%20.51%31.15%-12.72%

Correlation

The correlation between NINDX and FZROX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2018

0.99

The correlation between NINDX and FZROX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NINDX vs. FZROX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NINDX
NINDX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
NINDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NINDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
NINDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
NINDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
NINDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

FZROX
FZROX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FZROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZROX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FZROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZROX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NINDX vs. FZROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Large Cap Index Fund (NINDX) and Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NINDXFZROXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.45

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

3.39

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.49

15.66

-0.17

NINDX vs. FZROX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NINDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the FZROX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NINDX and FZROX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NINDXFZROXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

2.47

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.77

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.73

-0.09

Drawdowns

NINDX vs. FZROX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NINDX drawdown since its inception was -55.32%, which is greater than FZROX's maximum drawdown of -34.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NINDX and FZROX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NINDXFZROXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.32%

-34.96%

-20.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.91%

-8.89%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.78%

-19.38%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.60%

-25.12%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.77%

-5.51%

-3.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

1.92%

-0.01%

Volatility

NINDX vs. FZROX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Large Cap Index Fund (NINDX) is 2.83%, while Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX) has a volatility of 2.99%. This indicates that NINDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FZROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NINDXFZROXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.83%

2.99%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.98%

9.22%

-0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.88%

12.22%

-0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.91%

17.44%

-0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.07%

20.13%

-2.06%

NINDX vs. FZROX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NINDX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FZROX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NINDX vs. FZROX - Dividend Comparison

NINDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.32%, more than FZROX's 0.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FZROX
Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund
0.91%1.02%1.16%1.36%1.57%1.25%1.27%1.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NINDX
Columbia Large Cap Index Fund
24.32%27.15%8.71%8.82%13.23%16.96%7.23%9.84%9.43%4.21%2.24%2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, NINDX and FZROX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FZROX has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to NINDX (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NINDX dropped -55.32% vs FZROX's -34.96%.

NINDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NINDX and FZROX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer