PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NINDX vs. FLVCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NINDX vs. FLVCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Large Cap Index Fund (NINDX) and Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund (FLVCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NINDX achieves a 5.68% return, which is significantly lower than FLVCX's 26.99% return. Over the past 10 years, NINDX has underperformed FLVCX with an annualized return of 15.13%, while FLVCX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.53% annualized return.


NINDX

1D
-4.02%
1M
-3.58%
YTD
5.68%
6M
4.71%
1Y
20.81%
3Y*
19.68%
5Y*
12.63%
10Y*
15.13%

FLVCX

1D
1.44%
1M
9.26%
YTD
26.99%
6M
25.31%
1Y
44.76%
3Y*
29.79%
5Y*
15.32%
10Y*
16.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NINDX vs. FLVCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NINDX
Columbia Large Cap Index Fund
5.68%17.56%24.83%26.09%-18.11%28.62%18.10%31.36%-4.85%21.23%
FLVCX
Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund
26.99%20.34%26.95%26.10%-22.99%26.08%26.74%35.60%-16.43%20.92%

Correlation

The correlation between NINDX and FLVCX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2000

0.87

The correlation between NINDX and FLVCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NINDX vs. FLVCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NINDX
NINDX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
NINDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NINDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
NINDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
NINDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
NINDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

FLVCX
FLVCX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FLVCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLVCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLVCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FLVCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLVCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NINDX vs. FLVCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Large Cap Index Fund (NINDX) and Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund (FLVCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NINDXFLVCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.36

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

3.56

-1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.02

12.93

-1.91

NINDX vs. FLVCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NINDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the FLVCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NINDX and FLVCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NINDX vs. FLVCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NINDX drawdown since its inception was -55.32%, smaller than the maximum FLVCX drawdown of -70.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NINDX and FLVCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NINDXFLVCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.32%

-70.02%

+14.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.91%

-13.06%

+4.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.78%

-28.54%

+9.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.60%

-28.54%

+3.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.82%

-44.14%

+10.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.34%

0.00%

-5.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.76%

-10.98%

+2.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

3.59%

-1.59%

Volatility

NINDX vs. FLVCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Large Cap Index Fund (NINDX) is 6.25%, while Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund (FLVCX) has a volatility of 9.08%. This indicates that NINDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLVCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NINDXFLVCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.25%

9.08%

-2.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.69%

18.05%

-7.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.17%

22.29%

-9.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.10%

23.07%

-5.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.16%

23.51%

-5.35%

NINDX vs. FLVCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NINDX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FLVCX's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

NINDX vs. FLVCX - Dividend Comparison

NINDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.27%, more than FLVCX's 3.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLVCX
Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund
3.72%4.72%14.53%12.19%18.49%8.40%0.11%0.10%19.91%18.96%27.48%6.18%
NINDX
Columbia Large Cap Index Fund
14.27%27.15%8.71%8.82%13.23%16.96%7.23%9.84%9.43%4.21%2.24%2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


NINDX and FLVCX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLVCX has higher volatility (9.08%) compared to NINDX (6.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NINDX dropped -55.32% vs FLVCX's -70.02%.

FLVCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NINDX and FLVCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer