NINDX vs. CCIZX
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Large Cap Index Fund (NINDX) and Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional Class (CCIZX).
NINDX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Dec 15, 1993. CCIZX is an actively managed fund by Columbia. It was launched on Sep 27, 2010.
Performance
NINDX vs. CCIZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NINDX vs. CCIZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NINDX Columbia Large Cap Index Fund | -4.39% | 17.56% | 24.83% | 26.09% | -18.11% | 28.62% | 18.10% | 31.36% | -4.85% | 21.23% |
CCIZX Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional Class | 5.82% | 37.68% | 27.01% | 44.64% | -30.98% | 39.31% | 44.80% | 54.52% | -7.86% | 34.41% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NINDX achieves a -4.39% return, which is significantly lower than CCIZX's 5.82% return. Over the past 10 years, NINDX has underperformed CCIZX with an annualized return of 13.84%, while CCIZX has yielded a comparatively higher 23.18% annualized return.
NINDX
- 1D
- 2.91%
- 1M
- -5.04%
- YTD
- -4.39%
- 6M
- -2.14%
- 1Y
- 17.07%
- 3Y*
- 18.09%
- 5Y*
- 11.66%
- 10Y*
- 13.84%
CCIZX
- 1D
- 5.58%
- 1M
- -4.94%
- YTD
- 5.82%
- 6M
- 9.63%
- 1Y
- 65.69%
- 3Y*
- 31.97%
- 5Y*
- 17.37%
- 10Y*
- 23.18%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NINDX vs. CCIZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NINDX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CCIZX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NINDX vs. CCIZX — Risk / Return Rank
NINDX
CCIZX
NINDX vs. CCIZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Large Cap Index Fund (NINDX) and Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional Class (CCIZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NINDX | CCIZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.96 | 2.19 | -1.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.47 | 2.76 | -1.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.39 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | 4.50 | -3.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.18 | 16.98 | -9.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NINDX | CCIZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | 2.19 | -1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.67 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 0.89 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.80 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between NINDX and CCIZX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NINDX vs. CCIZX - Dividend Comparison
NINDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.39%, more than CCIZX's 7.55% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NINDX Columbia Large Cap Index Fund | 28.39% | 27.15% | 8.71% | 8.82% | 13.23% | 16.96% | 7.23% | 9.84% | 9.43% | 4.21% | 2.24% | 2.69% |
CCIZX Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional Class | 7.55% | 7.99% | 12.19% | 4.54% | 8.14% | 10.50% | 9.41% | 10.49% | 11.33% | 10.47% | 7.80% | 10.30% |
Drawdowns
NINDX vs. CCIZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NINDX drawdown since its inception was -55.32%, which is greater than CCIZX's maximum drawdown of -37.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NINDX and CCIZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NINDX | CCIZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.32% | -37.20% | -18.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.11% | -14.87% | +2.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.60% | -37.20% | +12.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.82% | -37.20% | +3.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.26% | -7.01% | +0.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.81% | -6.90% | -1.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 3.94% | -1.41% |
Volatility
NINDX vs. CCIZX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Large Cap Index Fund (NINDX) is 5.34%, while Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional Class (CCIZX) has a volatility of 11.14%. This indicates that NINDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCIZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NINDX | CCIZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.34% | 11.14% | -5.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.53% | 21.67% | -12.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.32% | 30.99% | -12.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.92% | 26.07% | -9.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.05% | 25.98% | -7.93% |