NIKL vs. SGDJ
NIKL (Sprott Nickel Miners ETF) and SGDJ (Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NIKL is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Nickel Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SGDJ is a Materials fund tracking the Solactive Junior Gold Miners Custom Factors Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, NIKL returned -3.02%/yr vs 49.70%/yr for SGDJ. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NIKL charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SGDJ.
Performance
NIKL vs. SGDJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NIKL achieves a -7.50% return, which is significantly lower than SGDJ's 2.34% return.
NIKL
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -13.19%
- YTD
- -7.50%
- 6M
- 4.95%
- 1Y
- 27.58%
- 3Y*
- -3.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SGDJ
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -0.22%
- YTD
- 2.34%
- 6M
- 11.75%
- 1Y
- 79.24%
- 3Y*
- 49.70%
- 5Y*
- 17.26%
- 10Y*
- 11.82%
NIKL vs. SGDJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NIKL Sprott Nickel Miners ETF | -7.50% | 52.05% | -22.48% | -17.88% |
SGDJ Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF | 2.34% | 174.44% | 19.35% | -1.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between NIKL and SGDJ is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2023 | 0.51 |
The correlation between NIKL and SGDJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
NIKL vs. SGDJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NIKL
SGDJ
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
NIKL
SGDJ
Communication Services
NIKL
-
SGDJ
-
Consumer Cyclical
NIKL
-
SGDJ
-
Consumer Defensive
NIKL
-
SGDJ
-
Energy
NIKL
-
SGDJ
-
Financial Services
NIKL
-
SGDJ
-
Healthcare
NIKL
-
SGDJ
-
Industrials
NIKL
-
SGDJ
-
Real Estate
NIKL
-
SGDJ
-
Technology
NIKL
-
SGDJ
-
Utilities
NIKL
-
SGDJ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NIKL vs. SGDJ — Risk / Return Rank
NIKL
SGDJ
NIKL vs. SGDJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Nickel Miners ETF (NIKL) and Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NIKL | SGDJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.28 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | 2.40 | -1.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.23 | 6.31 | -4.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NIKL | SGDJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 | 1.65 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.10 | 0.36 | -0.46 |
Drawdowns
NIKL vs. SGDJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NIKL drawdown since its inception was -60.23%, roughly equal to the maximum SGDJ drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NIKL and SGDJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NIKL | SGDJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.23% | -59.27% | -0.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.87% | -33.22% | +3.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.23% | -33.22% | -27.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -54.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.33% | -25.38% | -3.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.58% | -26.25% | -0.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.42% | 12.60% | -0.18% |
Volatility
NIKL vs. SGDJ - Volatility Comparison
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF (NIKL) has a higher volatility of 15.35% compared to Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) at 13.16%. This indicates that NIKL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGDJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NIKL | SGDJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.35% | 13.16% | +2.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.55% | 39.87% | -4.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.12% | 48.32% | -6.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.60% | 40.27% | -7.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.60% | 40.73% | -8.13% |
NIKL vs. SGDJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
NIKL has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SGDJ's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
NIKL vs. SGDJ - Dividend Comparison
NIKL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, less than SGDJ's 8.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NIKL Sprott Nickel Miners ETF | 2.73% | 2.53% | 3.49% | 19.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SGDJ Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF | 8.18% | 8.37% | 6.55% | 4.55% | 2.46% | 2.20% | 1.97% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 1.77% | 0.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NIKL and SGDJ have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NIKL has higher volatility (15.35%) compared to SGDJ (13.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NIKL dropped -60.23% vs SGDJ's -59.27%.
On 3-year performance, SGDJ leads with 49.70% vs -3.02% for NIKL. On fees, SGDJ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SGDJ has been the lower-risk option at 13.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SGDJ has performed better with a 49.70% return vs -3.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SGDJ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NIKL.
SGDJ has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 2.73% for NIKL.
NIKL is categorized as Energy Equities, while SGDJ is Materials. NIKL tracks Nasdaq Sprott Nickel Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SGDJ tracks Solactive Junior Gold Miners Custom Factors Index. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NIKL and 0.50% for SGDJ.
SGDJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NIKL and SGDJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer