PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NIFAX vs. FSTZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NIFAX vs. FSTZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide Inflation-Protected Securities Fund (NIFAX) and Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSTZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NIFAX achieves a 0.12% return, which is significantly lower than FSTZX's 0.67% return.


NIFAX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.68%
6M
-0.22%
YTD
0.12%
1Y
1.26%
3Y*
3.16%
5Y*
-0.21%
10Y*
2.28%
ALL TIME*
1.59%

FSTZX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.90%
6M
0.06%
YTD
0.67%
1Y
1.86%
3Y*
4.66%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

NIFAX vs. FSTZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NIFAX
Nationwide Inflation-Protected Securities Fund
0.12%6.32%1.45%3.61%-12.59%1.45%
FSTZX
Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund
0.67%5.99%4.87%4.67%-2.83%1.32%

Correlation

The correlation between NIFAX and FSTZX is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2021

0.77

The correlation between NIFAX and FSTZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NIFAX vs. FSTZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NIFAX
NIFAX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
NIFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NIFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
NIFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
NIFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
NIFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

FSTZX
FSTZX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FSTZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTZX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NIFAX vs. FSTZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Inflation-Protected Securities Fund (NIFAX) and Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSTZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NIFAXFSTZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.25

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

1.37

-0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.40

5.22

-2.82

NIFAX vs. FSTZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NIFAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the FSTZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NIFAX and FSTZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NIFAX vs. FSTZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NIFAX drawdown since its inception was -15.19%, which is greater than FSTZX's maximum drawdown of -5.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NIFAX and FSTZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NIFAXFSTZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.19%

-5.30%

-9.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.98%

-1.59%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.85%

-1.59%

-2.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.88%

-1.39%

-1.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.81%

-1.08%

-3.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.76%

0.42%

+0.34%

Volatility

NIFAX vs. FSTZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nationwide Inflation-Protected Securities Fund (NIFAX) is 0.71%, while Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSTZX) has a volatility of 1.40%. This indicates that NIFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSTZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NIFAXFSTZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.71%

1.40%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.29%

1.83%

+0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.08%

2.13%

+0.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.84%

2.83%

+3.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.37%

2.83%

+2.54%

NIFAX vs. FSTZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NIFAX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than FSTZX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

NIFAX vs. FSTZX - Dividend Comparison

NIFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, more than FSTZX's 2.87% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSTZX
Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund
2.87%4.02%2.78%2.54%5.25%0.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NIFAX
Nationwide Inflation-Protected Securities Fund
4.41%3.99%3.17%3.90%6.60%5.29%0.94%4.94%1.79%1.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


NIFAX and FSTZX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSTZX has higher volatility (1.40%) compared to NIFAX (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NIFAX dropped -15.19% vs FSTZX's -5.30%.

FSTZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NIFAX and FSTZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer