PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NIFAX vs. IPBAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NIFAX vs. IPBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide Inflation-Protected Securities Fund (NIFAX) and Allspring Real Return Fund (IPBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NIFAX achieves a 0.12% return, which is significantly lower than IPBAX's 8.62% return. Over the past 10 years, NIFAX has underperformed IPBAX with an annualized return of 2.28%, while IPBAX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.29% annualized return.


NIFAX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.68%
6M
-0.22%
YTD
0.12%
1Y
1.26%
3Y*
3.16%
5Y*
-0.21%
10Y*
2.28%
ALL TIME*
1.59%

IPBAX

1D
0.74%
1M
-2.07%
6M
2.02%
YTD
8.62%
1Y
15.74%
3Y*
9.84%
5Y*
4.57%
10Y*
4.29%
ALL TIME*
4.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

NIFAX vs. IPBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NIFAX
Nationwide Inflation-Protected Securities Fund
0.12%6.32%1.45%3.61%-12.59%4.69%10.66%12.06%-1.87%2.60%
IPBAX
Allspring Real Return Fund
8.62%10.37%8.12%5.35%-10.75%7.74%8.03%9.87%-4.02%4.07%

Correlation

The correlation between NIFAX and IPBAX is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between NIFAX and IPBAX has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NIFAX vs. IPBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NIFAX
NIFAX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
NIFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NIFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
NIFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
NIFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
NIFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

IPBAX
IPBAX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
IPBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
IPBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NIFAX vs. IPBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Inflation-Protected Securities Fund (NIFAX) and Allspring Real Return Fund (IPBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NIFAXIPBAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.30

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

2.28

-1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.40

8.07

-5.66

NIFAX vs. IPBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NIFAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the IPBAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NIFAX and IPBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NIFAX vs. IPBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NIFAX drawdown since its inception was -15.19%, roughly equal to the maximum IPBAX drawdown of -15.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NIFAX and IPBAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NIFAXIPBAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.19%

-15.13%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.98%

-6.49%

+4.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.85%

-6.49%

+2.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.19%

-13.94%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.19%

-13.94%

-1.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.88%

-5.80%

+2.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.81%

-3.14%

-1.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.76%

1.83%

-1.07%

Volatility

NIFAX vs. IPBAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nationwide Inflation-Protected Securities Fund (NIFAX) is 0.71%, while Allspring Real Return Fund (IPBAX) has a volatility of 3.05%. This indicates that NIFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IPBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NIFAXIPBAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.71%

3.05%

-2.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.29%

7.33%

-5.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.08%

8.97%

-5.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.84%

7.51%

-1.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.37%

6.16%

-0.79%

NIFAX vs. IPBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NIFAX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than IPBAX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

NIFAX vs. IPBAX - Dividend Comparison

NIFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, less than IPBAX's 12.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IPBAX
Allspring Real Return Fund
12.01%2.58%2.26%3.71%5.07%3.84%1.26%2.12%2.57%1.96%1.77%2.13%
NIFAX
Nationwide Inflation-Protected Securities Fund
4.41%3.99%3.17%3.90%6.60%5.29%0.94%4.94%1.79%1.65%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NIFAX and IPBAX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IPBAX has higher volatility (3.05%) compared to NIFAX (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NIFAX dropped -15.19% vs IPBAX's -15.13%.

IPBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NIFAX and IPBAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer