NICO vs. PSL
NICO (Hexis Active Nicotine Engagement ETF) and PSL (Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NICO is a Consumer Staples Equities fund actively managed by Hexis, while PSL is a Momentum fund tracking the DWA Consumer Staples Technical Leaders Index. NICO is actively managed, while PSL is passively managed. Their 0.54 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. NICO charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PSL.
Performance
NICO vs. PSL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NICO
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 2.46%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
PSL
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- 1.33%
- 6M
- 5.31%
- YTD
- 14.07%
- 1Y
- 5.76%
- 3Y*
- 10.10%
- 5Y*
- 5.68%
- 10Y*
- 7.97%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.35%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $39.10K | $20.84K | $57.43K | |
| $228.72K | $189.64K | $199.77K |
NICO vs. PSL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NICO Hexis Active Nicotine Engagement ETF | 4.32% |
PSL Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF | 1.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between NICO and PSL is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026 | 0.54 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NICO vs. PSL — Risk / Return Rank
NICO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PSL
NICO vs. PSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hexis Active Nicotine Engagement ETF (NICO) and Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NICO | PSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.08 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.42 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.93 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NICO vs. PSL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NICO drawdown since its inception was -8.00%, smaller than the maximum PSL drawdown of -41.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NICO and PSL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NICO | PSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.00% | -41.58% | +33.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.72% | -2.15% | -0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.88% | -5.80% | +1.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.22% | — |
Volatility
NICO vs. PSL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NICO | PSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.57% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.63% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.96% | 13.52% | +8.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.96% | 15.14% | +6.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.96% | 16.54% | +5.42% |
NICO vs. PSL - Expense Ratio Comparison
NICO has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than PSL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
NICO vs. PSL - Dividend Comparison
NICO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NICO Hexis Active Nicotine Engagement ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSL Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF | 0.73% | 0.93% | 0.60% | 1.37% | 1.98% | 1.24% | 0.80% | 0.47% | 0.75% | 0.34% | 2.08% | 1.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NICO and PSL have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PSL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PSL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for NICO.
PSL has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.00% for NICO.
NICO is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while PSL is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Hexis and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for NICO and 0.60% for PSL.
Find the right allocation for NICO and PSL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer