PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NI vs. FAN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NI vs. FAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NiSource Inc. (NI) and First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF (FAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NI achieves a 12.26% return, which is significantly lower than FAN's 18.35% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NI having a 9.30% annualized return and FAN not far behind at 8.98%.


NI

1D
1.23%
1M
-3.04%
6M
7.69%
YTD
12.26%
1Y
18.35%
3Y*
22.84%
5Y*
16.20%
10Y*
9.30%

FAN

1D
-0.77%
1M
-2.08%
6M
12.26%
YTD
18.35%
1Y
31.66%
3Y*
12.58%
5Y*
4.62%
10Y*
8.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NI vs. FAN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NI
NiSource Inc.
12.26%16.81%43.48%0.48%2.67%24.75%-14.87%13.03%1.92%19.28%
FAN
First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF
18.35%40.38%-8.96%-3.20%-13.12%-11.63%61.16%31.22%-11.40%16.30%

Correlation

The correlation between NI and FAN is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2008

0.37

Over the past year, the correlation between NI and FAN has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NI vs. FAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NI
NI Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
NI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
NI Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
NI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
NI Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

FAN
FAN Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
FAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAN Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAN Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NI vs. FAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NiSource Inc. (NI) and First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF (FAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NIFANDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.27

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

2.64

-0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.62

7.58

-1.96

NI vs. FAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NI Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the FAN Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NI and FAN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NI vs. FAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NI drawdown since its inception was -65.73%, smaller than the maximum FAN drawdown of -79.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NI and FAN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NIFANDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.73%

-79.94%

+14.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.14%

-12.07%

+2.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.73%

-24.13%

+6.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.76%

-38.45%

+13.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.95%

-46.29%

+15.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.73%

-11.03%

+5.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.96%

-44.95%

+31.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.27%

4.19%

-0.92%

Volatility

NI vs. FAN - Volatility Comparison

NiSource Inc. (NI) has a higher volatility of 6.27% compared to First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF (FAN) at 5.75%. This indicates that NI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NIFANDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.27%

5.75%

+0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.18%

16.04%

-2.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.38%

20.47%

-2.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.10%

21.40%

-1.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.20%

20.93%

+2.27%

Dividends

NI vs. FAN - Dividend Comparison

NI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, more than FAN's 0.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAN
First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF
0.97%1.35%1.52%1.71%1.50%1.79%0.84%2.42%2.67%2.59%6.04%2.35%
NI
NiSource Inc.
2.51%2.68%2.88%3.77%3.43%3.19%3.66%2.87%3.08%2.73%2.89%145.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


NI and FAN have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NI has higher volatility (6.27%) compared to FAN (5.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NI dropped -65.73% vs FAN's -79.94%.

FAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NI and FAN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer