NHYM vs. NCLO
NHYM (Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF) and NCLO (Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NHYM is a High Yield Muni fund actively managed by Nuveen, while NCLO is a CLO fund tracking the JP Morgan CLO A Index. NHYM is actively managed, while NCLO is passively managed. Over the past year, NHYM returned 8.84% vs 5.98% for NCLO. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NHYM charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for NCLO.
Performance
NHYM vs. NCLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NHYM achieves a 2.83% return, which is significantly higher than NCLO's 2.12% return.
NHYM
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- 2.83%
- 6M
- 3.37%
- 1Y
- 8.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NCLO
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- YTD
- 2.12%
- 6M
- 2.84%
- 1Y
- 5.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NHYM vs. NCLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NHYM Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF | 2.83% | 3.25% |
NCLO Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF | 2.12% | 5.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between NHYM and NCLO is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2025 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NHYM vs. NCLO — Risk / Return Rank
NHYM
NCLO
NHYM vs. NCLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF (NHYM) and Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF (NCLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NHYM | NCLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.02 | 1.65 | +0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.13 | 2.11 | +1.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.47 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.18 | 2.01 | +1.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.32 | 13.38 | -4.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NHYM | NCLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 1.65 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 1.63 | -0.86 |
Drawdowns
NHYM vs. NCLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NHYM drawdown since its inception was -6.11%, which is greater than NCLO's maximum drawdown of -3.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NHYM and NCLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NHYM | NCLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.11% | -3.05% | -3.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.77% | -3.05% | +0.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.19% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.74% | -0.20% | -1.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | 0.46% | +0.49% |
Volatility
NHYM vs. NCLO - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF (NHYM) has a higher volatility of 1.34% compared to Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF (NCLO) at 1.14%. This indicates that NHYM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NCLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NHYM | NCLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.34% | 1.14% | +0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.65% | 3.45% | -0.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.39% | 3.64% | +0.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.94% | 3.72% | +2.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.94% | 3.72% | +2.22% |
NHYM vs. NCLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
NHYM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than NCLO's 0.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
NHYM vs. NCLO - Dividend Comparison
NHYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, less than NCLO's 5.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
NCLO Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF | 5.77% | 6.09% | 0.35% |
NHYM Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF | 4.53% | 4.06% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NHYM and NCLO have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NHYM has higher volatility (1.34%) compared to NCLO (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NHYM dropped -6.11% vs NCLO's -3.05%.
On 1-year performance, NHYM leads with 8.84% vs 5.98% for NCLO. On fees, NCLO is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, NCLO has been the lower-risk option at 1.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NHYM has performed better with a 8.84% return vs 5.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NCLO is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NHYM.
NCLO has the higher dividend yield at 5.77%, compared with 4.53% for NHYM.
NHYM is categorized as High Yield Muni, while NCLO is CLO. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NHYM and 0.26% for NCLO.
NHYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NHYM and NCLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer