PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NHYM vs. DCMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NHYM vs. DCMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF (NHYM) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NHYM achieves a 2.81% return, which is significantly lower than DCMT's 25.74% return.


NHYM

1D
-0.14%
1M
0.30%
6M
2.19%
YTD
2.81%
1Y
8.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DCMT

1D
2.59%
1M
-0.52%
6M
21.60%
YTD
25.74%
1Y
28.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NHYM vs. DCMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NHYM and DCMT is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2025

-0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NHYM vs. DCMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NHYM
NHYM Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
NHYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NHYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
NHYM Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
NHYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
NHYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

DCMT
DCMT Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
DCMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCMT Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
DCMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCMT Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NHYM vs. DCMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF (NHYM) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NHYMDCMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.27

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

1.78

+1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.49

6.45

+5.04

NHYM vs. DCMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NHYM Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the DCMT Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NHYM and DCMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NHYM vs. DCMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NHYM drawdown since its inception was -6.11%, smaller than the maximum DCMT drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NHYM and DCMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NHYMDCMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.11%

-15.96%

+9.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.77%

-15.96%

+13.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-9.74%

+9.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.62%

-3.51%

+1.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.76%

4.40%

-3.64%

Volatility

NHYM vs. DCMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF (NHYM) is 0.69%, while DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT) has a volatility of 6.10%. This indicates that NHYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DCMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NHYMDCMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.69%

6.10%

-5.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.65%

16.86%

-14.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.21%

18.80%

-14.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.74%

16.03%

-10.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.74%

16.03%

-10.29%

NHYM vs. DCMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

NHYM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DCMT's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

NHYM vs. DCMT - Dividend Comparison

NHYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than DCMT's 2.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
DCMT
DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF
2.92%3.67%1.59%
NHYM
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF
4.54%4.06%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NHYM and DCMT have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DCMT has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to NHYM (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NHYM dropped -6.11% vs DCMT's -15.96%.

On 1-year performance, DCMT leads with 28.33% vs 8.61% for NHYM. On fees, NHYM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NHYM has been the lower-risk option at 0.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DCMT has performed better with a 28.33% return vs 8.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NHYM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for DCMT.

NHYM has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 2.92% for DCMT.

NHYM is categorized as High Yield Muni, while DCMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NHYM and 0.66% for DCMT.

NHYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NHYM and DCMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer