NHYB vs. NUMV
NHYB (Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and NUMV (Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NHYB is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA BB-B US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index, while NUMV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the TIAA ESG USA Mid-Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NHYB charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for NUMV.
Performance
NHYB vs. NUMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NHYB achieves a 1.46% return, which is significantly lower than NUMV's 10.03% return.
NHYB
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 1.79%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NUMV
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- 3.33%
- YTD
- 10.03%
- 6M
- 10.89%
- 1Y
- 23.50%
- 3Y*
- 16.75%
- 5Y*
- 6.61%
- 10Y*
- —
NHYB vs. NUMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NHYB Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.46% | 1.30% |
NUMV Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF | 10.03% | 3.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between NHYB and NUMV is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2025 | 0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NHYB vs. NUMV — Risk / Return Rank
NHYB
NUMV
NHYB vs. NUMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (NHYB) and Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NHYB | NUMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.96 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 0.45 | +0.65 |
Drawdowns
NHYB vs. NUMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NHYB drawdown since its inception was -2.40%, smaller than the maximum NUMV drawdown of -43.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NHYB and NUMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NHYB | NUMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.40% | -43.46% | +41.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -0.94% | +0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.37% | -6.88% | +6.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.29% | — |
Volatility
NHYB vs. NUMV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NHYB | NUMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.09% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.24% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.67% | 12.53% | -8.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.67% | 17.40% | -13.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.67% | 19.76% | -16.09% |
NHYB vs. NUMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
NHYB has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than NUMV's 0.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
NHYB vs. NUMV - Dividend Comparison
NHYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, more than NUMV's 1.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NHYB Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 4.26% | 1.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NUMV Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF | 1.39% | 1.53% | 1.81% | 2.20% | 5.78% | 6.62% | 1.38% | 2.40% | 4.01% | 0.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NHYB and NUMV have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NHYB is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NHYB is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for NUMV.
NHYB has the higher dividend yield at 4.26%, compared with 1.39% for NUMV.
NHYB is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while NUMV is Mid Cap Value Equities. NHYB tracks ICE BofA BB-B US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index, while NUMV tracks TIAA ESG USA Mid-Cap Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for NHYB and 0.31% for NUMV.
Find the right allocation for NHYB and NUMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer