NHYB vs. NULG
NHYB (Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and NULG (Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NHYB is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA BB-B US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index, while NULG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large Cap Growth. Both are passively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NHYB charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for NULG.
Performance
NHYB vs. NULG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NHYB achieves a 1.46% return, which is significantly lower than NULG's 12.10% return.
NHYB
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 1.79%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NULG
- 1D
- -3.99%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- 12.10%
- 6M
- 10.55%
- 1Y
- 21.00%
- 3Y*
- 22.92%
- 5Y*
- 13.73%
- 10Y*
- —
NHYB vs. NULG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NHYB Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.46% | 1.30% |
NULG Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF | 12.10% | -0.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between NHYB and NULG is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2025 | 0.66 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NHYB vs. NULG — Risk / Return Rank
NHYB
NULG
NHYB vs. NULG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (NHYB) and Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NHYB | NULG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 0.87 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
NHYB vs. NULG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NHYB drawdown since its inception was -2.40%, smaller than the maximum NULG drawdown of -36.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NHYB and NULG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NHYB | NULG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.40% | -36.17% | +33.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -4.94% | +4.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.37% | -6.84% | +6.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.27% | — |
Volatility
NHYB vs. NULG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NHYB | NULG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.19% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.18% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.67% | 17.49% | -13.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.67% | 21.58% | -17.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.67% | 21.43% | -17.76% |
NHYB vs. NULG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NHYB has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than NULG's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
NHYB vs. NULG - Dividend Comparison
NHYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, more than NULG's 0.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NHYB Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 4.26% | 1.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NULG Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.10% | 0.11% | 0.16% | 0.43% | 0.40% | 5.08% | 2.68% | 1.10% | 3.73% | 0.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NHYB and NULG have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NHYB is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NHYB is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for NULG.
NHYB has the higher dividend yield at 4.26%, compared with 0.10% for NULG.
NHYB is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while NULG is Large Cap Growth Equities. NHYB tracks ICE BofA BB-B US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index, while NULG tracks MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large Cap Growth. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for NHYB and 0.25% for NULG.
Find the right allocation for NHYB and NULG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer