NHYB vs. JNK
NHYB (Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and JNK (State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - NHYB tracks the ICE BofA BB-B US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index while JNK tracks the Bloomberg High Yield Very Liquid Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NHYB charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for JNK.
Performance
NHYB vs. JNK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NHYB achieves a 1.99% return, which is significantly higher than JNK's 1.74% return.
NHYB
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 1.99%
- 6M
- 1.95%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JNK
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 1.74%
- 6M
- 1.80%
- 1Y
- 5.90%
- 3Y*
- 8.72%
- 5Y*
- 3.57%
- 10Y*
- 5.08%
NHYB vs. JNK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NHYB Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.99% | 1.24% |
JNK State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF | 1.74% | 1.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between NHYB and JNK is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NHYB vs. JNK — Risk / Return Rank
NHYB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
JNK
NHYB vs. JNK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (NHYB) and State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF (JNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NHYB | JNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.36 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.36 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NHYB vs. JNK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NHYB drawdown since its inception was -2.40%, smaller than the maximum JNK drawdown of -38.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NHYB and JNK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NHYB | JNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.40% | -38.48% | +36.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -0.24% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.36% | -3.69% | +3.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.57% | — |
Volatility
NHYB vs. JNK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NHYB | JNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.03% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.05% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.61% | 3.87% | -0.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.61% | 7.55% | -3.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.61% | 8.27% | -4.66% |
NHYB vs. JNK - Expense Ratio Comparison
NHYB has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than JNK's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
NHYB vs. JNK - Dividend Comparison
NHYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, less than JNK's 6.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNK State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF | 6.61% | 6.54% | 6.63% | 6.38% | 6.06% | 4.27% | 5.11% | 5.44% | 5.90% | 5.60% | 6.06% | 6.59% |
NHYB Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 4.24% | 1.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, NHYB and JNK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, NHYB is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NHYB is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for JNK.
JNK has the higher dividend yield at 6.61%, compared with 4.24% for NHYB.
NHYB tracks ICE BofA BB-B US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index, while JNK tracks Bloomberg High Yield Very Liquid Index. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for NHYB and 0.40% for JNK.
Find the right allocation for NHYB and JNK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer