NHYB vs. BSJR
NHYB (Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and BSJR (Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - NHYB tracks the ICE BofA BB-B US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index while BSJR tracks the NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2027 Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NHYB charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for BSJR.
Performance
NHYB vs. BSJR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NHYB achieves a 1.99% return, which is significantly higher than BSJR's 1.42% return.
NHYB
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 1.99%
- 6M
- 1.95%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSJR
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 1.42%
- 6M
- 1.46%
- 1Y
- 4.16%
- 3Y*
- 7.95%
- 5Y*
- 3.27%
- 10Y*
- —
NHYB vs. BSJR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NHYB Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.99% | 1.24% |
BSJR Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.42% | 0.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between NHYB and BSJR is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NHYB vs. BSJR — Risk / Return Rank
NHYB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BSJR
NHYB vs. BSJR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (NHYB) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NHYB | BSJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.40 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.59 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 16.40 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NHYB vs. BSJR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NHYB drawdown since its inception was -2.40%, smaller than the maximum BSJR drawdown of -22.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NHYB and BSJR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NHYB | BSJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.40% | -22.58% | +20.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -0.07% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.36% | -3.22% | +2.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.25% | — |
Volatility
NHYB vs. BSJR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NHYB | BSJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.57% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.61% | 2.07% | +1.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.61% | 6.73% | -3.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.61% | 9.32% | -5.71% |
NHYB vs. BSJR - Expense Ratio Comparison
NHYB has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than BSJR's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
NHYB vs. BSJR - Dividend Comparison
NHYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, less than BSJR's 5.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJR Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 5.67% | 6.19% | 6.75% | 6.48% | 5.37% | 4.49% | 4.53% | 1.20% |
NHYB Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 4.24% | 1.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NHYB and BSJR have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NHYB is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NHYB is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJR.
BSJR has the higher dividend yield at 5.67%, compared with 4.24% for NHYB.
NHYB tracks ICE BofA BB-B US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index, while BSJR tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2027 Index. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for NHYB and 0.42% for BSJR.
Find the right allocation for NHYB and BSJR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer