PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NHS vs. FOCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NHS vs. FOCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund (NHS) and Fairholme Focused Income Fund (FOCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NHS achieves a -7.75% return, which is significantly lower than FOCIX's 6.99% return. Over the past 10 years, NHS has underperformed FOCIX with an annualized return of 5.68%, while FOCIX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.06% annualized return.


NHS

1D
0.95%
1M
0.17%
YTD
-7.75%
6M
-4.01%
1Y
-1.55%
3Y*
8.86%
5Y*
-1.04%
10Y*
5.68%

FOCIX

1D
-0.19%
1M
-0.96%
YTD
6.99%
6M
6.13%
1Y
11.18%
3Y*
11.73%
5Y*
8.48%
10Y*
7.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NHS vs. FOCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NHS
Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund
-7.75%14.81%11.04%6.12%-22.99%15.78%4.57%39.03%-11.45%8.64%
FOCIX
Fairholme Focused Income Fund
6.99%6.17%14.67%12.58%6.00%6.73%0.99%7.44%-6.88%-0.54%

Correlation

The correlation between NHS and FOCIX is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2010

0.26

The correlation between NHS and FOCIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.29 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NHS vs. FOCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NHS
NHS Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
NHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
NHS Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
NHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
NHS Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

FOCIX
FOCIX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FOCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
FOCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NHS vs. FOCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund (NHS) and Fairholme Focused Income Fund (FOCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NHSFOCIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.25

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.09

3.09

-3.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.23

9.09

-9.31

NHS vs. FOCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NHS Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the FOCIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NHS and FOCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NHSFOCIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

1.39

-1.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

0.87

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.78

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.79

-0.44

Drawdowns

NHS vs. FOCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NHS drawdown since its inception was -64.67%, which is greater than FOCIX's maximum drawdown of -18.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NHS and FOCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NHSFOCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.67%

-18.78%

-45.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.01%

-3.33%

-13.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.01%

-7.96%

-9.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.43%

-12.36%

-25.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.97%

-18.61%

-24.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.32%

-2.15%

-11.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.86%

-4.77%

-4.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.86%

1.13%

+5.73%

Volatility

NHS vs. FOCIX - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund (NHS) has a higher volatility of 3.17% compared to Fairholme Focused Income Fund (FOCIX) at 2.55%. This indicates that NHS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FOCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NHSFOCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.17%

2.55%

+0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.96%

5.64%

+4.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.89%

7.41%

+5.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.17%

9.76%

+6.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.70%

9.07%

+7.63%

NHS vs. FOCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NHS has a 4.14% expense ratio, which is higher than FOCIX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

NHS vs. FOCIX - Dividend Comparison

NHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.90%, more than FOCIX's 1.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FOCIX
Fairholme Focused Income Fund
1.23%1.31%2.46%2.82%2.24%1.12%0.65%2.75%4.57%9.83%5.16%5.51%
NHS
Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund
16.90%14.60%14.50%13.94%12.75%8.74%9.29%7.99%8.37%7.59%8.23%9.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


NHS and FOCIX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NHS has higher volatility (3.17%) compared to FOCIX (2.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NHS dropped -64.67% vs FOCIX's -18.78%.

FOCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NHS and FOCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer