PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NHMAX vs. FGIYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NHMAX vs. FGIYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A (NHMAX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund (FGIYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NHMAX achieves a 3.02% return, which is significantly lower than FGIYX's 9.75% return. Over the past 10 years, NHMAX has underperformed FGIYX with an annualized return of 3.46%, while FGIYX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.21% annualized return.


NHMAX

1D
-0.07%
1M
1.16%
YTD
3.02%
6M
3.67%
1Y
9.34%
3Y*
4.97%
5Y*
0.94%
10Y*
3.46%

FGIYX

1D
-0.24%
1M
-3.21%
YTD
9.75%
6M
9.72%
1Y
15.41%
3Y*
14.60%
5Y*
9.33%
10Y*
9.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NHMAX vs. FGIYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NHMAX
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A
3.02%2.98%5.36%6.96%-15.14%9.71%3.03%11.96%1.79%11.90%
FGIYX
Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund
9.75%18.08%10.91%8.90%-6.10%14.85%-2.55%36.57%-7.70%19.64%

Correlation

The correlation between NHMAX and FGIYX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2007

0.07

The correlation between NHMAX and FGIYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.27 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NHMAX vs. FGIYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NHMAX
NHMAX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
NHMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NHMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
NHMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
NHMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
NHMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

FGIYX
FGIYX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
FGIYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGIYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGIYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
FGIYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGIYX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NHMAX vs. FGIYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A (NHMAX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund (FGIYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NHMAXFGIYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.26

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

2.49

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.14

8.33

-0.18

NHMAX vs. FGIYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NHMAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is higher than the FGIYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NHMAX and FGIYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NHMAXFGIYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

1.44

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.71

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.60

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.45

+0.41

Drawdowns

NHMAX vs. FGIYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NHMAX drawdown since its inception was -45.60%, smaller than the maximum FGIYX drawdown of -49.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NHMAX and FGIYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NHMAXFGIYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.60%

-49.18%

+3.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.58%

-5.99%

+2.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.58%

-12.49%

+1.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.65%

-20.92%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.22%

-38.06%

+15.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-4.12%

+4.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.49%

-7.03%

+1.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.20%

1.79%

-0.59%

Volatility

NHMAX vs. FGIYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A (NHMAX) is 1.54%, while Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund (FGIYX) has a volatility of 3.83%. This indicates that NHMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGIYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NHMAXFGIYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.54%

3.83%

-2.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.10%

8.57%

-5.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.45%

10.36%

-5.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.83%

13.22%

-6.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.70%

15.36%

-8.66%

NHMAX vs. FGIYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NHMAX has a 2.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FGIYX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

NHMAX vs. FGIYX - Dividend Comparison

NHMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.87%, less than FGIYX's 15.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGIYX
Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund
15.14%10.28%7.74%2.51%6.41%7.48%1.62%12.32%6.62%6.10%8.64%3.31%
NHMAX
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A
5.87%6.30%5.54%7.10%5.41%4.49%4.83%4.77%5.26%5.20%5.61%5.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


NHMAX and FGIYX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FGIYX has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to NHMAX (1.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NHMAX dropped -45.60% vs FGIYX's -49.18%.

NHMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NHMAX and FGIYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer