PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NHMAX vs. CXHYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NHMAX vs. CXHYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A (NHMAX) and Delaware National High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund (CXHYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NHMAX achieves a 3.38% return, which is significantly higher than CXHYX's 2.29% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NHMAX having a 3.34% annualized return and CXHYX not far ahead at 3.35%.


NHMAX

1D
0.07%
1M
2.51%
YTD
3.38%
6M
4.00%
1Y
9.06%
3Y*
4.70%
5Y*
0.76%
10Y*
3.34%

CXHYX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.51%
YTD
2.29%
6M
2.85%
1Y
5.67%
3Y*
4.62%
5Y*
0.76%
10Y*
3.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NHMAX vs. CXHYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NHMAX
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A
3.38%2.51%5.36%6.96%-15.14%9.71%3.03%11.96%1.79%11.90%
CXHYX
Delaware National High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund
2.29%1.71%5.76%8.26%-14.85%7.86%6.49%11.52%1.58%10.15%

Correlation

The correlation between NHMAX and CXHYX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 1999

0.74

The correlation between NHMAX and CXHYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (all time) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NHMAX vs. CXHYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NHMAX
NHMAX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
NHMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NHMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
NHMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
NHMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
NHMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

CXHYX
CXHYX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
CXHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CXHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
CXHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
CXHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
CXHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NHMAX vs. CXHYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A (NHMAX) and Delaware National High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund (CXHYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NHMAXCXHYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.30

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

1.73

+0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.58

4.96

+2.63

NHMAX vs. CXHYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NHMAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the CXHYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NHMAX and CXHYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NHMAX vs. CXHYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NHMAX drawdown since its inception was -45.60%, which is greater than CXHYX's maximum drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NHMAX and CXHYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NHMAXCXHYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.60%

-21.82%

-23.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.58%

-3.31%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.29%

-9.55%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.65%

-20.11%

-1.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.22%

-20.11%

-2.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.41%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.48%

-2.58%

-2.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.20%

1.15%

+0.05%

Volatility

NHMAX vs. CXHYX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A (NHMAX) and Delaware National High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund (CXHYX) have volatilities of 1.10% and 1.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NHMAXCXHYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.10%

1.09%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.05%

2.83%

+0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.40%

4.03%

+0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.83%

6.08%

+0.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.69%

5.80%

+0.89%

NHMAX vs. CXHYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NHMAX has a 2.00% expense ratio, which is higher than CXHYX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

NHMAX vs. CXHYX - Dividend Comparison

NHMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.40%, more than CXHYX's 4.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CXHYX
Delaware National High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund
4.97%6.41%5.43%3.99%4.94%3.61%4.42%5.27%4.92%4.98%3.87%3.77%
NHMAX
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A
5.40%5.84%5.54%7.10%5.41%4.49%4.83%4.77%5.26%5.20%5.61%5.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


NHMAX and CXHYX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NHMAX has higher volatility (1.10%) compared to CXHYX (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NHMAX dropped -45.60% vs CXHYX's -21.82%.

NHMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NHMAX and CXHYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer