NHINX vs. SCFIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Neuberger Berman High Income Bond Fund (NHINX) and Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund (SCFIX).
NHINX is managed by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on Jan 31, 1992. SCFIX is managed by Shenkman Funds. It was launched on Oct 31, 2012.
Performance
NHINX vs. SCFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NHINX vs. SCFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NHINX Neuberger Berman High Income Bond Fund | -1.82% | 8.39% | 7.94% | 9.92% | -13.02% | 4.42% | 6.27% | 13.90% | -2.63% | 5.09% |
SCFIX Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund | -0.61% | 7.02% | 6.11% | 9.24% | -2.52% | 5.08% | 3.36% | 7.61% | 0.85% | 3.54% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NHINX achieves a -1.82% return, which is significantly lower than SCFIX's -0.61% return. Over the past 10 years, NHINX has outperformed SCFIX with an annualized return of 4.64%, while SCFIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.30% annualized return.
NHINX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -2.59%
- YTD
- -1.82%
- 6M
- -0.51%
- 1Y
- 5.52%
- 3Y*
- 7.11%
- 5Y*
- 2.60%
- 10Y*
- 4.64%
SCFIX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.81%
- YTD
- -0.61%
- 6M
- 0.92%
- 1Y
- 5.06%
- 3Y*
- 6.27%
- 5Y*
- 4.65%
- 10Y*
- 4.30%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NHINX vs. SCFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NHINX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SCFIX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NHINX vs. SCFIX — Risk / Return Rank
NHINX
SCFIX
NHINX vs. SCFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman High Income Bond Fund (NHINX) and Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund (SCFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NHINX | SCFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.64 | 2.61 | -0.97 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.32 | 3.70 | -1.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.65 | -0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 3.04 | -1.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.60 | 15.96 | -8.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NHINX | SCFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.64 | 2.61 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 1.60 | -1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | 1.32 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 1.30 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between NHINX and SCFIX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NHINX vs. SCFIX - Dividend Comparison
NHINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.03%, more than SCFIX's 5.00% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NHINX Neuberger Berman High Income Bond Fund | 6.03% | 6.43% | 6.80% | 5.38% | 4.37% | 4.67% | 4.73% | 5.22% | 5.63% | 5.00% | 5.33% | 6.38% |
SCFIX Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund | 5.00% | 5.54% | 5.85% | 5.21% | 3.86% | 4.93% | 3.24% | 3.78% | 3.87% | 3.09% | 3.07% | 3.38% |
Drawdowns
NHINX vs. SCFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NHINX drawdown since its inception was -29.47%, which is greater than SCFIX's maximum drawdown of -13.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NHINX and SCFIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NHINX | SCFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.47% | -13.08% | -16.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.03% | -1.63% | -1.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.38% | -6.30% | -10.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.85% | -13.08% | -9.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.59% | -1.01% | -1.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.77% | -0.52% | -3.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.73% | 0.31% | +0.42% |
Volatility
NHINX vs. SCFIX - Volatility Comparison
Neuberger Berman High Income Bond Fund (NHINX) has a higher volatility of 1.31% compared to Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund (SCFIX) at 0.79%. This indicates that NHINX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NHINX | SCFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.31% | 0.79% | +0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.33% | 1.19% | +1.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.76% | 1.96% | +1.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.19% | 2.92% | +2.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.90% | 3.27% | +2.63% |