NHINX vs. FQTIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Neuberger Berman High Income Bond Fund (NHINX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX).
NHINX is managed by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on Jan 31, 1992. FQTIX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jun 3, 2019.
Performance
NHINX vs. FQTIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NHINX vs. FQTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NHINX Neuberger Berman High Income Bond Fund | -1.82% | 8.39% | 7.94% | 9.92% | -13.02% | 4.42% | 6.27% | 6.81% |
FQTIX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I | 0.52% | 7.51% | 8.03% | 13.44% | -14.39% | 8.51% | 3.68% | 4.11% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NHINX achieves a -1.82% return, which is significantly lower than FQTIX's 0.52% return.
NHINX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -2.59%
- YTD
- -1.82%
- 6M
- -0.51%
- 1Y
- 5.52%
- 3Y*
- 7.11%
- 5Y*
- 2.60%
- 10Y*
- 4.64%
FQTIX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -1.83%
- YTD
- 0.52%
- 6M
- 2.66%
- 1Y
- 9.72%
- 3Y*
- 7.86%
- 5Y*
- 3.61%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NHINX vs. FQTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NHINX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FQTIX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NHINX vs. FQTIX — Risk / Return Rank
NHINX
FQTIX
NHINX vs. FQTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman High Income Bond Fund (NHINX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NHINX | FQTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.64 | 2.55 | -0.91 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.32 | 3.46 | -1.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.61 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 3.85 | -2.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.60 | 17.15 | -9.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NHINX | FQTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.64 | 2.55 | -0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.61 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 0.55 | +0.56 |
Correlation
The correlation between NHINX and FQTIX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NHINX vs. FQTIX - Dividend Comparison
NHINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.03%, less than FQTIX's 7.03% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NHINX Neuberger Berman High Income Bond Fund | 6.03% | 6.43% | 6.80% | 5.38% | 4.37% | 4.67% | 4.73% | 5.22% | 5.63% | 5.00% | 5.33% | 6.38% |
FQTIX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I | 7.03% | 5.70% | 7.86% | 7.64% | 8.10% | 7.15% | 6.89% | 5.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
NHINX vs. FQTIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NHINX drawdown since its inception was -29.47%, which is greater than FQTIX's maximum drawdown of -24.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NHINX and FQTIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NHINX | FQTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.47% | -24.62% | -4.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.03% | -2.41% | -0.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.38% | -18.81% | +2.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.59% | -1.95% | -0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.77% | -4.42% | +0.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.73% | 0.54% | +0.19% |
Volatility
NHINX vs. FQTIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Neuberger Berman High Income Bond Fund (NHINX) is 1.31%, while Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX) has a volatility of 1.57%. This indicates that NHINX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FQTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NHINX | FQTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.31% | 1.57% | -0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.33% | 2.38% | -0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.76% | 3.85% | -0.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.19% | 5.92% | -0.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.90% | 7.80% | -1.90% |