NGRRX vs. NSBRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen International Value Fund (NGRRX) and Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX).
NGRRX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Dec 19, 1999. NSBRX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Mar 28, 2006.
Performance
NGRRX vs. NSBRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NGRRX vs. NSBRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NGRRX Nuveen International Value Fund | -0.50% | 36.06% | 4.57% | 20.60% | -8.85% | 12.34% | 3.92% | 18.46% | -18.08% | 20.75% |
NSBRX Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund | -2.40% | 10.03% | 17.56% | 15.08% | -9.63% | 27.17% | 9.79% | 41.88% | -4.36% | 20.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NGRRX achieves a -0.50% return, which is significantly higher than NSBRX's -2.40% return. Over the past 10 years, NGRRX has underperformed NSBRX with an annualized return of 8.36%, while NSBRX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.44% annualized return.
NGRRX
- 1D
- 3.38%
- 1M
- -7.56%
- YTD
- -0.50%
- 6M
- 4.56%
- 1Y
- 23.83%
- 3Y*
- 15.60%
- 5Y*
- 9.85%
- 10Y*
- 8.36%
NSBRX
- 1D
- 1.84%
- 1M
- -5.23%
- YTD
- -2.40%
- 6M
- -2.56%
- 1Y
- 8.82%
- 3Y*
- 12.65%
- 5Y*
- 9.33%
- 10Y*
- 12.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NGRRX vs. NSBRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NGRRX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than NSBRX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NGRRX vs. NSBRX — Risk / Return Rank
NGRRX
NSBRX
NGRRX vs. NSBRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen International Value Fund (NGRRX) and Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NGRRX | NSBRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.41 | 0.61 | +0.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.91 | 0.97 | +0.94 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.14 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | 0.82 | +0.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.91 | 3.53 | +2.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NGRRX | NSBRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.41 | 0.61 | +0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.66 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.75 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.58 | -0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between NGRRX and NSBRX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NGRRX vs. NSBRX - Dividend Comparison
NGRRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than NSBRX's 9.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NGRRX Nuveen International Value Fund | 0.23% | 0.23% | 2.48% | 2.07% | 5.15% | 4.09% | 2.15% | 3.17% | 1.56% | 3.13% | 2.15% | 1.67% |
NSBRX Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund | 9.19% | 9.26% | 6.82% | 3.01% | 3.58% | 3.67% | 4.68% | 15.68% | 7.04% | 4.57% | 1.75% | 6.24% |
Drawdowns
NGRRX vs. NSBRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NGRRX drawdown since its inception was -59.12%, which is greater than NSBRX's maximum drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NGRRX and NSBRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NGRRX | NSBRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.12% | -45.14% | -13.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.87% | -10.75% | -3.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.36% | -19.79% | -6.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.91% | -33.69% | -8.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.10% | -6.10% | -4.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.45% | -5.28% | -10.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | 2.50% | +1.06% |
Volatility
NGRRX vs. NSBRX - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen International Value Fund (NGRRX) has a higher volatility of 7.77% compared to Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX) at 4.11%. This indicates that NGRRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NSBRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NGRRX | NSBRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.77% | 4.11% | +3.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.14% | 7.73% | +3.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.88% | 15.14% | +1.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.56% | 14.29% | +1.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 16.59% | -0.28% |