PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NGRRX vs. JQC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NGRRX vs. JQC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen International Value Fund (NGRRX) and Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund (JQC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NGRRX achieves a 6.13% return, which is significantly higher than JQC's 0.73% return. Over the past 10 years, NGRRX has outperformed JQC with an annualized return of 8.69%, while JQC has yielded a comparatively lower 5.78% annualized return.


NGRRX

1D
0.22%
1M
3.37%
YTD
6.13%
6M
10.30%
1Y
21.59%
3Y*
18.07%
5Y*
10.07%
10Y*
8.69%

JQC

1D
-0.83%
1M
1.03%
YTD
0.73%
6M
0.62%
1Y
2.31%
3Y*
11.73%
5Y*
4.75%
10Y*
5.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NGRRX vs. JQC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NGRRX
Nuveen International Value Fund
6.13%36.06%4.57%20.60%-8.85%12.34%3.92%18.46%-18.08%20.75%
JQC
Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund
0.73%-0.36%22.29%15.26%-14.22%13.29%-2.96%21.78%-4.33%-0.27%

Correlation

The correlation between NGRRX and JQC is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2003

0.39

Over the past year, the correlation between NGRRX and JQC has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NGRRX vs. JQC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NGRRX
NGRRX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
NGRRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NGRRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
NGRRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
NGRRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
NGRRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

JQC
JQC Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
JQC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JQC Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
JQC Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
JQC Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
JQC Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NGRRX vs. JQC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen International Value Fund (NGRRX) and Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund (JQC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NGRRXJQCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.05

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

0.23

+1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.36

0.46

+4.90

NGRRX vs. JQC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NGRRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is higher than the JQC Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NGRRX and JQC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NGRRXJQCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

0.21

+1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.36

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.33

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.23

+0.09

Drawdowns

NGRRX vs. JQC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NGRRX drawdown since its inception was -59.12%, smaller than the maximum JQC drawdown of -75.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NGRRX and JQC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NGRRXJQCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.12%

-75.18%

+16.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.87%

-10.15%

-3.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.53%

-15.37%

+0.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.36%

-19.83%

-6.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.91%

-47.99%

+6.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.11%

-5.34%

+1.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.38%

-8.82%

-6.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.97%

5.04%

-1.07%

Volatility

NGRRX vs. JQC - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen International Value Fund (NGRRX) has a higher volatility of 4.78% compared to Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund (JQC) at 2.16%. This indicates that NGRRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JQC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NGRRXJQCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.78%

2.16%

+2.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.12%

8.80%

+3.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.84%

11.11%

+3.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.74%

13.17%

+2.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.39%

17.56%

-1.17%

NGRRX vs. JQC - Expense Ratio Comparison

NGRRX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than JQC's 4.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

NGRRX vs. JQC - Dividend Comparison

NGRRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than JQC's 13.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JQC
Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund
13.22%12.91%11.39%11.42%9.71%10.03%16.11%16.14%6.53%7.42%6.99%7.51%
NGRRX
Nuveen International Value Fund
0.21%0.23%2.48%2.07%5.15%4.09%2.15%3.17%1.56%3.13%2.15%1.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


NGRRX and JQC have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NGRRX has higher volatility (4.78%) compared to JQC (2.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NGRRX dropped -59.12% vs JQC's -75.18%.

NGRRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NGRRX and JQC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer