NGHT vs. MSBT
NGHT (Nicholas Bitcoin and Treasuries AfterDark ETF) and MSBT (Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust) are both Cryptocurrency funds. NGHT is actively managed, while MSBT is passively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NGHT charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for MSBT.
Performance
NGHT vs. MSBT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NGHT
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- 1.96%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSBT
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 5.84%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NGHT vs. MSBT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NGHT Nicholas Bitcoin and Treasuries AfterDark ETF | -15.90% |
MSBT Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust | -12.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between NGHT and MSBT is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2026 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NGHT vs. MSBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Bitcoin and Treasuries AfterDark ETF (NGHT) and Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NGHT vs. MSBT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NGHT drawdown since its inception was -21.53%, smaller than the maximum MSBT drawdown of -28.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NGHT and MSBT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NGHT | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.53% | -28.33% | +6.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.99% | -22.16% | +2.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.22% | -11.01% | +1.79% |
Volatility
NGHT vs. MSBT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NGHT | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.93% | 37.18% | -7.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.93% | 37.18% | -7.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.93% | 37.18% | -7.25% |
NGHT vs. MSBT - Expense Ratio Comparison
NGHT has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than MSBT's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
NGHT vs. MSBT - Dividend Comparison
Neither NGHT nor MSBT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NGHT and MSBT have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MSBT is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSBT is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for NGHT.
NGHT and MSBT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Nicholas and Morgan Stanley. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for NGHT and 0.14% for MSBT.
Find the right allocation for NGHT and MSBT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer