NGHT vs. CBOL
NGHT (Nicholas Bitcoin and Treasuries AfterDark ETF) and CBOL (Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NGHT is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Nicholas, while CBOL is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. Both are actively managed. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. NGHT charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for CBOL.
Performance
NGHT vs. CBOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NGHT
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- -6.11%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
CBOL
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- 6M
- -1.94%
- YTD
- -1.84%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $52.76K | $27.00K | $15.79K | |
| $192.25K | $331.23K | $485.78K |
NGHT vs. CBOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NGHT Nicholas Bitcoin and Treasuries AfterDark ETF | -18.89% |
CBOL Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF | 0.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between NGHT and CBOL is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2026 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NGHT vs. CBOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Bitcoin and Treasuries AfterDark ETF (NGHT) and Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF (CBOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NGHT vs. CBOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NGHT drawdown since its inception was -23.66%, which is greater than CBOL's maximum drawdown of -5.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NGHT and CBOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NGHT | CBOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.66% | -5.05% | -18.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.84% | -4.46% | -18.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.60% | -3.46% | -8.14% |
Volatility
NGHT vs. CBOL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NGHT | CBOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.40% | 3.67% | +26.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.40% | 3.67% | +26.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.40% | 3.67% | +26.73% |
NGHT vs. CBOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
NGHT has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than CBOL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
NGHT vs. CBOL - Dividend Comparison
NGHT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CBOL Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF | 1.82% | 1.79% |
NGHT Nicholas Bitcoin and Treasuries AfterDark ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NGHT and CBOL have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBOL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBOL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for NGHT.
CBOL has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 0.00% for NGHT.
NGHT is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBOL is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Nicholas and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for NGHT and 0.79% for CBOL.
Find the right allocation for NGHT and CBOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer