NGAS.L vs. UC90.L
NGAS.L (WisdomTree Natural Gas ETF) and UC90.L (UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc) are both Commodities funds - NGAS.L tracks the Bloomberg Natural Gas Sub Total Return Index while UC90.L tracks the UBS CMCI (GBP Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, NGAS.L returned -23.35%/yr vs 7.02%/yr for UC90.L. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NGAS.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for UC90.L.
Performance
NGAS.L vs. UC90.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
NGAS.L is traded in USD, while UC90.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UC90.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NGAS.L achieves a -11.49% return, which is significantly lower than UC90.L's 22.71% return. Over the past 10 years, NGAS.L has underperformed UC90.L with an annualized return of -23.35%, while UC90.L has yielded a comparatively higher 7.02% annualized return.
NGAS.L
- 1D
- 2.07%
- 1M
- 4.84%
- YTD
- -11.49%
- 6M
- -29.61%
- 1Y
- -36.85%
- 3Y*
- -25.66%
- 5Y*
- -25.67%
- 10Y*
- -23.35%
UC90.L
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 22.71%
- 6M
- 24.63%
- 1Y
- 30.96%
- 3Y*
- 16.58%
- 5Y*
- 9.99%
- 10Y*
- 7.02%
NGAS.L vs. UC90.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NGAS.L WisdomTree Natural Gas ETF | -11.49% | -24.72% | -26.18% | -65.28% | 20.27% | 25.42% | -43.27% | -40.74% | 2.93% | -37.77% |
UC90.L UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc | 22.71% | 17.85% | 2.78% | 3.15% | 2.58% | 32.01% | 1.77% | 10.16% | -16.84% | 15.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between NGAS.L and UC90.L is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2015 | 0.17 |
NGAS.L vs. UC90.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NGAS.L
UC90.L
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
NGAS.L
UC90.L
Communication Services
NGAS.L
-
UC90.L
Consumer Cyclical
NGAS.L
-
UC90.L
Consumer Defensive
NGAS.L
-
UC90.L
Energy
NGAS.L
-
UC90.L
Financial Services
NGAS.L
-
UC90.L
Healthcare
NGAS.L
-
UC90.L
Industrials
NGAS.L
-
UC90.L
Real Estate
NGAS.L
-
UC90.L
-
Technology
NGAS.L
-
UC90.L
Utilities
NGAS.L
-
UC90.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NGAS.L vs. UC90.L — Risk / Return Rank
NGAS.L
UC90.L
NGAS.L vs. UC90.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Natural Gas ETF (NGAS.L) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc (UC90.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NGAS.L | UC90.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.38 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | 5.31 | -6.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.11 | 11.41 | -12.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NGAS.L | UC90.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.66 | 2.18 | -2.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.44 | 0.54 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.46 | 0.38 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.59 | 0.24 | -0.84 |
Drawdowns
NGAS.L vs. UC90.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NGAS.L drawdown since its inception was -99.91%, which is greater than UC90.L's maximum drawdown of -56.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NGAS.L and UC90.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NGAS.L | UC90.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.91% | -56.43% | -43.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.73% | -5.80% | -41.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.31% | -10.92% | -59.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -93.13% | -33.67% | -59.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.91% | -48.07% | -46.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.91% | -4.12% | -95.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.09% | -21.04% | -68.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.25% | 2.71% | +30.54% |
Volatility
NGAS.L vs. UC90.L - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Natural Gas ETF (NGAS.L) has a higher volatility of 11.19% compared to UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc (UC90.L) at 5.69%. This indicates that NGAS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UC90.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NGAS.L | UC90.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.19% | 5.69% | +5.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.23% | 11.66% | +35.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.38% | 14.12% | +41.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.00% | 18.66% | +40.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.65% | 18.74% | +31.91% |
NGAS.L vs. UC90.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
NGAS.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than UC90.L's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
NGAS.L vs. UC90.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither NGAS.L nor UC90.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NGAS.L and UC90.L have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UC90.L is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UC90.L is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for NGAS.L.
NGAS.L tracks Bloomberg Natural Gas Sub Total Return Index, while UC90.L tracks UBS CMCI (GBP Hedged). They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for NGAS.L and 0.34% for UC90.L.
Find the right allocation for NGAS.L and UC90.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer