NFXS vs. MUU

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

NFXS (Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - NFXS is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while MUU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). NFXS is actively managed, while MUU is passively managed. Over the past year, NFXS returned 49.59% vs 2844.73% for MUU. Their -0.01 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. NFXS charges 1.03%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for MUU.

Performance

NFXS vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFXS achieves a 22.37% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 378.90% return.

NFXS

• 1D: -2.09%
• 1M: 5.48%
• 6M: 7.74%
• YTD: 22.37%
• 1Y: 49.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -6.83%

MUU

• 1D: 1.35%
• 1M: -35.62%
• 6M: 114.51%
• YTD: 378.90%
• 1Y: 2,844.73%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 419.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	$1.54B	$1.50B	$2.29B
NFXS Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares	$438.99K	$959.25K	$649.73K

NFXS vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NFXS Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares	22.37%	-8.56%	-18.87%
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	378.90%	599.03%	-40.91%

Correlation

The correlation between NFXS and MUU is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2024	-0.01

The correlation between NFXS and MUU shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NFXS vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NFXS

NFXS Risk / Return Rank: 49
NFXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
NFXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
NFXS Omega Ratio Rank: 60
NFXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
NFXS Martin Ratio Rank: 39

MUU

MUU Risk / Return Rank: 98
MUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
MUU Omega Ratio Rank: 96
MUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
MUU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NFXS vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NFXS	MUU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.42	17.89	-16.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.03	4.98	-2.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.63	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.59	42.38	-40.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.30	138.45	-134.15

NFXS vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFXS Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is lower than the MUU Sharpe Ratio of 17.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFXS and MUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NFXS vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFXS drawdown since its inception was -50.37%, smaller than the maximum MUU drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFXS and MUU.

Drawdown Indicators

	NFXS	MUU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.37%	-75.07%	+24.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.31%	-68.07%	+36.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.17%	-60.98%	+46.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.77%	-24.42%	-6.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.55%	20.79%	-9.24%

Volatility

NFXS vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS) is 9.93%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 61.31%. This indicates that NFXS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NFXS	MUU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.93%	61.31%	-51.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.52%	133.76%	-105.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.14%	161.53%	-126.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.93%	146.55%	-111.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.93%	146.55%	-111.62%

NFXS vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFXS has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

NFXS vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

NFXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, more than MUU's 1.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	1.42%	4.27%	0.31%
NFXS Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares	2.90%	3.53%	0.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NFXS and MUU in my portfolio?

NFXS and MUU have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NFXS or MUU?

MUU has higher volatility (61.31%) compared to NFXS (9.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFXS dropped -50.37% vs MUU's -75.07%.

Which ETF is better, NFXS or MUU?

On 1-year performance, MUU leads with 2844.73% vs 49.59% for NFXS. On fees, MUU is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, NFXS has been the lower-risk option at 9.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NFXS or MUU?

Over the 1-year period, MUU has performed better with a 2844.73% return vs 49.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NFXS or MUU?

MUU is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for NFXS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NFXS or MUU?

NFXS has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 1.42% for MUU.

What is the main difference between NFXS and MUU?

NFXS is categorized as Inverse Equities, while MUU is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for NFXS and 1.01% for MUU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.89 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.