NFXL vs. TSLL
NFXL (Direxion Daily NFLX Bull 2X Shares) and TSLL (Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 1.5X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NFXL returned -62.59% vs 7.17% for TSLL. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NFXL charges 1.06%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for TSLL.
Performance
NFXL vs. TSLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFXL achieves a -28.60% return, which is significantly lower than TSLL's -20.85% return.
NFXL
- 1D
- -5.81%
- 1M
- -19.33%
- YTD
- -28.60%
- 6M
- -48.60%
- 1Y
- -62.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 13.88%
- YTD
- -20.85%
- 6M
- -21.38%
- 1Y
- 7.17%
- 3Y*
- 9.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NFXL vs. TSLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NFXL Direxion Daily NFLX Bull 2X Shares | -28.60% | -11.98% | 50.97% |
TSLL Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 1.5X Shares | -20.85% | -26.80% | 139.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFXL and TSLL is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2024 | 0.22 |
The correlation between NFXL and TSLL shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
NFXL vs. TSLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NFXL
TSLL
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
NFXL
TSLL
-
Basic Materials
NFXL
-
TSLL
-
Consumer Cyclical
NFXL
-
TSLL
Consumer Defensive
NFXL
-
TSLL
-
Energy
NFXL
-
TSLL
-
Financial Services
NFXL
-
TSLL
-
Healthcare
NFXL
-
TSLL
-
Industrials
NFXL
-
TSLL
-
Real Estate
NFXL
-
TSLL
-
Technology
NFXL
-
TSLL
-
Utilities
NFXL
-
TSLL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFXL vs. TSLL — Risk / Return Rank
NFXL
TSLL
NFXL vs. TSLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily NFLX Bull 2X Shares (NFXL) and Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 1.5X Shares (TSLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NFXL | TSLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.95 | 0.08 | -1.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.54 | 0.77 | -2.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.09 | -0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | 0.13 | -0.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.35 | 0.27 | -1.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NFXL | TSLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.95 | 0.08 | -1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.05 | -0.08 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
NFXL vs. TSLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFXL drawdown since its inception was -71.97%, smaller than the maximum TSLL drawdown of -82.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFXL and TSLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFXL | TSLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.97% | -82.88% | +10.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.97% | -54.75% | -17.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -82.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.68% | -60.03% | -8.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.97% | -53.82% | +25.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 45.86% | 26.72% | +19.14% |
Volatility
NFXL vs. TSLL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily NFLX Bull 2X Shares (NFXL) is 14.02%, while Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 1.5X Shares (TSLL) has a volatility of 24.26%. This indicates that NFXL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFXL | TSLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.02% | 24.26% | -10.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.06% | 54.47% | -3.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.27% | 92.38% | -26.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.51% | 106.87% | -37.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.51% | 106.87% | -37.36% |
NFXL vs. TSLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
NFXL has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLL's 1.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
NFXL vs. TSLL - Dividend Comparison
NFXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.17%, more than TSLL's 6.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFXL Direxion Daily NFLX Bull 2X Shares | 11.17% | 7.97% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLL Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 1.5X Shares | 6.46% | 5.00% | 2.47% | 4.44% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NFXL and TSLL have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLL has higher volatility (24.26%) compared to NFXL (14.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFXL dropped -71.97% vs TSLL's -82.88%.
On 1-year performance, TSLL leads with 7.17% vs -62.59% for NFXL. On fees, NFXL is cheaper at 1.06% per year. On volatility, NFXL has been the lower-risk option at 14.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSLL has performed better with a 7.17% return vs -62.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NFXL is cheaper with a 1.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for TSLL.
NFXL has the higher dividend yield at 11.17%, compared with 6.46% for TSLL.
Their fees differ too: 1.06% for NFXL and 1.08% for TSLL.
TSLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.08 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NFXL and TSLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer