NFXL vs. MUU

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

NFXL (Direxion Daily NFLX Bull 2X Shares) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NFXL returned -62.59% vs 6522.95% for MUU. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.06% expense ratio.

Performance

NFXL vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily NFLX Bull 2X Shares (NFXL) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFXL achieves a -28.60% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 961.23% return.

NFXL

• 1D: -5.81%
• 1M: -19.33%
• YTD: -28.60%
• 6M: -48.60%
• 1Y: -62.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MUU

• 1D: 3.08%
• 1M: 218.90%
• YTD: 961.23%
• 6M: 1,422.01%
• 1Y: 6,522.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFXL vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NFXL Direxion Daily NFLX Bull 2X Shares	-28.60%	-11.98%	41.76%
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	961.23%	599.03%	-43.09%

Correlation

The correlation between NFXL and MUU is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2024	0.05

The correlation between NFXL and MUU shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NFXL vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFXL

NFXL Risk / Return Rank: 1
NFXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
NFXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
NFXL Omega Ratio Rank: 1
NFXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
NFXL Martin Ratio Rank: 2

MUU

MUU Risk / Return Rank: 99
MUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
MUU Omega Ratio Rank: 97
MUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MUU Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFXL vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily NFLX Bull 2X Shares (NFXL) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NFXL	MUU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.95	50.40	-51.35
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.54	7.17	-8.71
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.80	1.91	-1.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.86	125.85	-126.71
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.35	426.84	-428.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NFXL vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFXL Sharpe Ratio is -0.95, which is lower than the MUU Sharpe Ratio of 50.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFXL and MUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NFXL	MUU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.95	50.40	-51.35
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.05	6.68	-6.73

Drawdowns

NFXL vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFXL drawdown since its inception was -71.97%, roughly equal to the maximum MUU drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFXL and MUU.

Drawdown Indicators

	NFXL	MUU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.97%	-75.07%	+3.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-71.97%	-52.72%	-19.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-68.68%	0.00%	-68.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.97%	-23.44%	-4.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	45.86%	15.51%	+30.35%

Volatility

NFXL vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily NFLX Bull 2X Shares (NFXL) is 14.02%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 54.78%. This indicates that NFXL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NFXL	MUU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.02%	54.78%	-40.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	51.06%	105.07%	-54.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	66.27%	131.77%	-65.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	69.51%	133.67%	-64.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	69.51%	133.67%	-64.16%

NFXL vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NFXL and MUU have an expense ratio of 1.06%.

Dividends

NFXL vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

NFXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.17%, more than MUU's 0.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	0.46%	4.27%	0.31%
NFXL Direxion Daily NFLX Bull 2X Shares	11.17%	7.97%	0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NFXL and MUU in my portfolio?

NFXL and MUU have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NFXL or MUU?

MUU has higher volatility (54.78%) compared to NFXL (14.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFXL dropped -71.97% vs MUU's -75.07%.

Which ETF is better, NFXL or MUU?

On 1-year performance, MUU leads with 6522.95% vs -62.59% for NFXL. Both ETFs have the same 1.06% expense ratio. On volatility, NFXL has been the lower-risk option at 14.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NFXL or MUU?

Over the 1-year period, MUU has performed better with a 6522.95% return vs -62.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NFXL or MUU?

NFXL and MUU have the same expense ratio: 1.06% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NFXL or MUU?

NFXL has the higher dividend yield at 11.17%, compared with 0.46% for MUU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (50.40 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.