NFTY vs. PIT
NFTY (First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF) and PIT (VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NFTY is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the NIFTY 50 Equal Weight Index, while PIT is a Commodities fund actively managed by VanEck. NFTY is passively managed, while PIT is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, NFTY returned 6.77%/yr vs 19.51%/yr for PIT. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NFTY charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PIT.
Performance
NFTY vs. PIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFTY achieves a -6.07% return, which is significantly lower than PIT's 27.31% return.
NFTY
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 2.35%
- YTD
- -6.07%
- 6M
- -6.17%
- 1Y
- -4.69%
- 3Y*
- 6.77%
- 5Y*
- 6.14%
- 10Y*
- 8.50%
PIT
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- -10.60%
- YTD
- 27.31%
- 6M
- 26.74%
- 1Y
- 38.33%
- 3Y*
- 19.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NFTY vs. PIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF | -6.07% | 5.47% | 5.18% | 24.00% | -0.90% |
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF | 27.31% | 21.63% | 6.77% | -4.54% | 1.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFTY and PIT is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2022 | 0.03 |
The correlation between NFTY and PIT shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFTY vs. PIT — Risk / Return Rank
NFTY
PIT
NFTY vs. PIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NFTY | PIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.32 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.29 | 2.74 | -3.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.72 | 10.88 | -11.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NFTY vs. PIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFTY drawdown since its inception was -47.67%, which is greater than PIT's maximum drawdown of -14.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFTY and PIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFTY | PIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.67% | -14.05% | -33.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.14% | -14.05% | -2.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.55% | -14.05% | -7.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.13% | -14.05% | -0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.60% | -4.07% | -5.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.53% | 3.59% | +2.94% |
Volatility
NFTY vs. PIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY) is 3.99%, while VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) has a volatility of 4.67%. This indicates that NFTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFTY | PIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.99% | 4.67% | -0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.70% | 19.36% | -6.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.73% | 21.66% | -6.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.40% | 17.50% | -0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.71% | 17.50% | +3.21% |
NFTY vs. PIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
NFTY has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than PIT's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
NFTY vs. PIT - Dividend Comparison
NFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than PIT's 7.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF | 1.88% | 1.24% | 1.61% | 0.13% | 5.89% | 1.53% | 0.61% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 4.10% | 3.28% | 4.39% |
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF | 7.00% | 8.92% | 3.59% | 6.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NFTY and PIT have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PIT has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to NFTY (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFTY dropped -47.67% vs PIT's -14.05%.
On 3-year performance, PIT leads with 19.51% vs 6.77% for NFTY. On fees, PIT is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, NFTY has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PIT has performed better with a 19.51% return vs 6.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PIT is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for NFTY.
PIT has the higher dividend yield at 7.00%, compared with 1.88% for NFTY.
NFTY is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while PIT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for NFTY and 0.55% for PIT.
PIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NFTY and PIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer