NFTY vs. GIND

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

NFTY (First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF) and GIND (Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF) are both India Equities funds. NFTY is passively managed, while GIND is actively managed. Over the past year, NFTY returned -9.06% vs -12.26% for GIND. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NFTY charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GIND.

Performance

NFTY vs. GIND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY) and Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF (GIND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NFTY having a -8.35% return and GIND slightly higher at -8.29%.

NFTY

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: -1.78%
• 6M: -7.54%
• YTD: -8.35%
• 1Y: -9.06%
• 3Y*: 4.29%
• 5Y*: 5.57%
• 10Y*: 7.23%

GIND

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 0.25%
• 6M: -6.18%
• YTD: -8.29%
• 1Y: -12.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFTY vs. GIND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF	-8.35%	5.71%
GIND Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF	-8.29%	4.70%

Correlation

The correlation between NFTY and GIND is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025	0.90

The correlation between NFTY and GIND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

NFTY vs. GIND - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NFTY	GIND
Financial Services	20.9%	29.7%
Consumer Cyclical	16.6%	16.1%
Basic Materials	13.1%	7.9%
Healthcare	9.9%	7.4%
Technology	9.0%	6.8%
Energy	8.5%	3.1%
Industrials	8.5%	12.0%
Consumer Defensive	8.1%	5.5%
Utilities	3.7%	3.6%
Communication Services	1.9%	2.2%
Real Estate	-	1.5%

Return for Risk

NFTY vs. GIND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFTY

NFTY Risk / Return Rank: 4
NFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
NFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
NFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 4
NFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
NFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 2

GIND

GIND Risk / Return Rank: 4
GIND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
GIND Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
GIND Omega Ratio Rank: 4
GIND Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
GIND Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFTY vs. GIND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY) and Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF (GIND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NFTY	GIND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.62	-0.74	+0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.85	-1.00	+0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	0.89	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.56	-0.56	0.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.34	-1.27	-0.07

NFTY vs. GIND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFTY Sharpe Ratio is -0.62, which is comparable to the GIND Sharpe Ratio of -0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFTY and GIND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NFTY vs. GIND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFTY drawdown since its inception was -47.67%, which is greater than GIND's maximum drawdown of -22.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFTY and GIND.

Drawdown Indicators

	NFTY	GIND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.67%	-22.97%	-24.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.14%	-22.01%	+5.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.55%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.55%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.67%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.22%	-13.05%	-3.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.63%	-7.44%	-2.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.82%	9.91%	-3.09%

Volatility

NFTY vs. GIND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY) is 3.01%, while Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF (GIND) has a volatility of 4.46%. This indicates that NFTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GIND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NFTY	GIND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.01%	4.46%	-1.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.58%	14.60%	-2.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.72%	16.71%	-1.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.40%	17.07%	+0.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.64%	17.07%	+3.57%

NFTY vs. GIND - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFTY has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than GIND's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

NFTY vs. GIND - Dividend Comparison

NFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, while GIND has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GIND Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF	1.93%	1.24%	1.61%	0.13%	5.89%	1.53%	0.61%	0.97%	0.00%	4.10%	3.28%	4.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NFTY and GIND in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, NFTY and GIND move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, NFTY or GIND?

GIND has higher volatility (4.46%) compared to NFTY (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFTY dropped -47.67% vs GIND's -22.97%.

Which ETF is better, NFTY or GIND?

On 1-year performance, NFTY leads with -9.06% vs -12.26% for GIND. On fees, GIND is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, NFTY has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NFTY or GIND?

Over the 1-year period, NFTY has performed better with a -9.06% return vs -12.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NFTY or GIND?

GIND is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for NFTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NFTY or GIND?

NFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 0.00% for GIND.

What is the main difference between NFTY and GIND?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for NFTY and 0.75% for GIND.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NFTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.62 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.