PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NFLY vs. PAPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NFLY vs. PAPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF (NFLY) and Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF (PAPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFLY achieves a -19.50% return, which is significantly lower than PAPI's 12.17% return.


NFLY

1D
0.13%
1M
-6.88%
6M
-13.08%
YTD
-19.50%
1Y
-32.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.31%

PAPI

1D
-0.23%
1M
2.42%
6M
5.56%
YTD
12.17%
1Y
19.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$416.46K$523.86K$744.62K
$2.06M$2.02M$1.93M

NFLY vs. PAPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
NFLY
YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF
-19.50%1.66%66.37%30.76%
PAPI
Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF
12.17%6.33%8.90%4.53%

Correlation

The correlation between NFLY and PAPI is 0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2023

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NFLY vs. PAPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NFLY
NFLY Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
NFLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLY Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLY Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

PAPI
PAPI Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
PAPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAPI Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
PAPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAPI Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NFLY vs. PAPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF (NFLY) and Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF (PAPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NFLYPAPIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.79

1.31

-0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.80

2.69

-3.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.47

6.78

-8.25

NFLY vs. PAPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFLY Sharpe Ratio is -1.14, which is lower than the PAPI Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFLY and PAPI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NFLY vs. PAPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFLY drawdown since its inception was -43.49%, which is greater than PAPI's maximum drawdown of -14.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLY and PAPI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NFLYPAPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.49%

-14.27%

-29.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.74%

-6.86%

-33.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.22%

-1.36%

-38.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.05%

-2.72%

-7.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.25%

2.71%

+19.54%

Volatility

NFLY vs. PAPI - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF (NFLY) has a higher volatility of 8.42% compared to Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF (PAPI) at 3.49%. This indicates that NFLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NFLYPAPIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.42%

3.49%

+4.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.71%

7.24%

+15.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.74%

10.44%

+18.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.38%

11.73%

+16.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.38%

11.73%

+16.65%

NFLY vs. PAPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFLY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than PAPI's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

NFLY vs. PAPI - Dividend Comparison

NFLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 64.16%, more than PAPI's 7.42% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
NFLY
YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF
64.16%61.53%49.91%11.84%
PAPI
Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF
7.42%7.59%7.07%1.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


NFLY and PAPI have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NFLY has higher volatility (8.42%) compared to PAPI (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLY dropped -43.49% vs PAPI's -14.27%.

On 1-year performance, PAPI leads with 19.72% vs -32.79% for NFLY. On fees, PAPI is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PAPI has been the lower-risk option at 3.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PAPI has performed better with a 19.72% return vs -32.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PAPI is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NFLY.

NFLY has the higher dividend yield at 64.16%, compared with 7.42% for PAPI.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Morgan Stanley. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for NFLY and 0.29% for PAPI.

PAPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs -1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NFLY and PAPI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer