NFLX vs. MAGS
NFLX (Netflix, Inc.) is a stock, while MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) is Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Over the past 3 years, NFLX returned 21.45%/yr vs 31.06%/yr for MAGS. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NFLX vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFLX achieves a -17.47% return, which is significantly lower than MAGS's -0.79% return.
NFLX
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -13.35%
- YTD
- -17.47%
- 6M
- -18.02%
- 1Y
- -37.16%
- 3Y*
- 21.45%
- 5Y*
- 9.09%
- 10Y*
- 23.49%
MAGS
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -5.84%
- YTD
- -0.79%
- 6M
- -1.07%
- 1Y
- 25.62%
- 3Y*
- 31.06%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NFLX vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NFLX Netflix, Inc. | -17.47% | 5.19% | 83.07% | 43.63% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | -0.79% | 22.99% | 63.97% | 35.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFLX and MAGS is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2023 | 0.45 |
Over the past year, the correlation between NFLX and MAGS has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFLX vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank
NFLX
MAGS
NFLX vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NFLX | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.21 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | 1.31 | -2.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | 4.36 | -5.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NFLX vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFLX drawdown since its inception was -81.99%, which is greater than MAGS's maximum drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLX and MAGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFLX | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.99% | -29.91% | -52.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.35% | -18.62% | -24.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.35% | -29.91% | -13.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.22% | -7.75% | -34.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.92% | -4.73% | -20.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.72% | 5.58% | +20.14% |
Volatility
NFLX vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) is 6.35%, while Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) has a volatility of 7.03%. This indicates that NFLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFLX | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.35% | 7.03% | -0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.86% | 15.57% | +9.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.33% | 20.60% | +12.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.14% | 26.01% | +17.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.52% | 26.01% | +15.51% |
Dividends
NFLX vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison
NFLX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 1.49% | 1.48% | 0.81% | 0.44% |
NFLX Netflix, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NFLX and MAGS have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MAGS has higher volatility (7.03%) compared to NFLX (6.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLX dropped -81.99% vs MAGS's -29.91%.
MAGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NFLX and MAGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer