NFLW vs. CONY

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

NFLW (Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF) and CONY (YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NFLW returned -50.09% vs -49.52% for CONY. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

NFLW vs. CONY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) and YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NFLW having a -27.54% return and CONY slightly higher at -26.79%.

NFLW

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: -21.07%
• YTD: -27.54%
• 6M: -27.44%
• 1Y: -50.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CONY

• 1D: -3.16%
• 1M: -11.77%
• YTD: -26.79%
• 6M: -30.97%
• 1Y: -49.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFLW vs. CONY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NFLW Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF	-27.54%	-29.54%
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF	-26.79%	-21.85%

Correlation

The correlation between NFLW and CONY is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025	0.21

Return for Risk

NFLW vs. CONY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFLW

NFLW Risk / Return Rank: 1
NFLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
NFLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
NFLW Omega Ratio Rank: 0
NFLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
NFLW Martin Ratio Rank: 1

CONY

CONY Risk / Return Rank: 2
CONY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
CONY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
CONY Omega Ratio Rank: 2
CONY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CONY Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFLW vs. CONY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) and YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NFLW	CONY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.24	-0.86	-0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.99	-1.22	-0.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.75	0.86	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.93	-0.78	-0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.59	-1.24	-0.34

NFLW vs. CONY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFLW Sharpe Ratio is -1.24, which is lower than the CONY Sharpe Ratio of -0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFLW and CONY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NFLW vs. CONY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFLW drawdown since its inception was -53.89%, smaller than the maximum CONY drawdown of -63.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLW and CONY.

Drawdown Indicators

	NFLW	CONY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.89%	-63.57%	+9.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.89%	-63.39%	+9.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-53.85%	-58.53%	+4.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.86%	-22.83%	-5.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	31.61%	39.89%	-8.28%

Volatility

NFLW vs. CONY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) is 9.81%, while YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) has a volatility of 15.74%. This indicates that NFLW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CONY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NFLW	CONY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.81%	15.74%	-5.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.49%	44.42%	-13.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.43%	57.79%	-17.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.29%	59.89%	-19.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.29%	59.89%	-19.60%

NFLW vs. CONY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NFLW and CONY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

NFLW vs. CONY - Dividend Comparison

NFLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 87.68%, less than CONY's 204.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF	204.97%	192.07%	155.66%	16.43%
NFLW Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF	87.68%	38.89%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NFLW and CONY in my portfolio?

NFLW and CONY have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NFLW or CONY?

CONY has higher volatility (15.74%) compared to NFLW (9.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLW dropped -53.89% vs CONY's -63.57%.

Which ETF is better, NFLW or CONY?

On 1-year performance, CONY leads with -49.52% vs -50.09% for NFLW. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, NFLW has been the lower-risk option at 9.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NFLW or CONY?

Over the 1-year period, CONY has performed better with a -49.52% return vs -50.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NFLW or CONY?

NFLW and CONY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NFLW or CONY?

CONY has the higher dividend yield at 204.97%, compared with 87.68% for NFLW.

What is the main difference between NFLW and CONY?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and YieldMax.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CONY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.86 vs -1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.