NFLW vs. BAMU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NFLW (Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NFLW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. NFLW charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.

Performance

NFLW vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFLW achieves a -16.78% return, which is significantly lower than BAMU's 1.06% return.

NFLW

• 1D: -2.48%
• 1M: -12.48%
• YTD: -16.78%
• 6M: -26.68%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMU

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 1.06%
• 6M: 1.25%
• 1Y: 2.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFLW vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NFLW Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF	-16.78%	-29.02%
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	1.06%	1.73%

Correlation

The correlation between NFLW and BAMU is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025	-0.16

NFLW vs. BAMU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NFLW	BAMU
Communication Services	25.9%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	98.8%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

NFLW vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMU

BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 98
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFLW vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NFLW	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	4.98	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-1.05	4.14	-5.20

Drawdowns

NFLW vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFLW drawdown since its inception was -50.73%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLW and BAMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	NFLW	BAMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.73%	-0.36%	-50.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-47.00%	0.00%	-47.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.84%	-0.02%	-26.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.03%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NFLW	BAMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.07%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.43%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.34%	0.59%	+39.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.34%	0.87%	+39.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.34%	0.87%	+39.47%

NFLW vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFLW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

NFLW vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison

NFLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 73.24%, more than BAMU's 3.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	3.06%	3.20%	3.97%	0.84%
NFLW Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF	73.24%	38.89%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NFLW and BAMU in my portfolio?

NFLW and BAMU have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NFLW or BAMU?

On fees, NFLW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NFLW or BAMU?

NFLW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NFLW or BAMU?

NFLW has the higher dividend yield at 73.24%, compared with 3.06% for BAMU.

What is the main difference between NFLW and BAMU?

NFLW is categorized as Derivative Income, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for NFLW and 1.09% for BAMU.