NFLW vs. ACYS
NFLW (Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF) and ACYS (FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NFLW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ACYS.
Performance
NFLW vs. ACYS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NFLW
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- -7.21%
- 6M
- -20.56%
- YTD
- -26.22%
- 1Y
- -48.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACYS
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NFLW vs. ACYS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NFLW Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF | -24.73% |
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF | 2.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFLW and ACYS is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFLW vs. ACYS — Risk / Return Rank
NFLW
ACYS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NFLW vs. ACYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NFLW | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.76 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.59 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NFLW vs. ACYS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFLW drawdown since its inception was -55.10%, which is greater than ACYS's maximum drawdown of -0.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLW and ACYS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFLW | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.10% | -0.63% | -54.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.01% | -0.10% | -52.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.35% | -0.14% | -29.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.82% | — | — |
Volatility
NFLW vs. ACYS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFLW | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.72% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.76% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.96% | 3.38% | +37.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.30% | 3.38% | +36.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.30% | 3.38% | +36.92% |
NFLW vs. ACYS - Expense Ratio Comparison
NFLW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ACYS's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
NFLW vs. ACYS - Dividend Comparison
NFLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 82.21%, more than ACYS's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF | 0.60% | 0.00% |
NFLW Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF | 82.21% | 38.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NFLW and ACYS have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACYS is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACYS is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NFLW.
NFLW has the higher dividend yield at 82.21%, compared with 0.60% for ACYS.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for NFLW and 0.75% for ACYS.
Find the right allocation for NFLW and ACYS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer