NFLU vs. XDQQ

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

NFLU (T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF) and XDQQ (Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NFLU returned -70.21% vs 8.25% for XDQQ. Their 0.34 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. NFLU charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XDQQ.

Performance

NFLU vs. XDQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU) and Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFLU achieves a -50.09% return, which is significantly lower than XDQQ's -3.31% return.

NFLU

• 1D: -4.37%
• 1M: -16.63%
• 6M: -36.31%
• YTD: -50.09%
• 1Y: -70.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -20.46%

XDQQ

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: -3.35%
• 6M: -4.49%
• YTD: -3.31%
• 1Y: 8.25%
• 3Y*: 13.96%
• 5Y*: 6.00%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
NFLU T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF	$3.54M	$5.25M	$4.46M
XDQQ Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly	$486.75K	$670.10K	$337.67K

NFLU vs. XDQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NFLU T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF	-50.09%	-12.47%	50.22%
XDQQ Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly	-3.31%	13.75%	8.24%

Correlation

The correlation between NFLU and XDQQ is 0.12, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2024	0.34

Over the past year, the correlation between NFLU and XDQQ has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.34, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

NFLU vs. XDQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NFLU

NFLU Risk / Return Rank: 1
NFLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
NFLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
NFLU Omega Ratio Rank: 1
NFLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
NFLU Martin Ratio Rank: 1

XDQQ

XDQQ Risk / Return Rank: 22
XDQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
XDQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
XDQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 21
XDQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
XDQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NFLU vs. XDQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU) and Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NFLU	XDQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.01	0.43	-1.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.82	0.68	-2.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.77	1.09	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.91	0.56	-1.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.44	2.24	-3.67

NFLU vs. XDQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFLU Sharpe Ratio is -1.01, which is lower than the XDQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFLU and XDQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NFLU vs. XDQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFLU drawdown since its inception was -80.45%, which is greater than XDQQ's maximum drawdown of -35.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLU and XDQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	NFLU	XDQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.45%	-35.63%	-44.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-77.14%	-11.84%	-65.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.17%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-78.21%	-6.13%	-72.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.00%	-10.57%	-21.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	48.81%	2.95%	+45.86%

Volatility

NFLU vs. XDQQ - Volatility Comparison

T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU) has a higher volatility of 23.16% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) at 7.20%. This indicates that NFLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NFLU	XDQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.16%	7.20%	+15.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	55.99%	11.90%	+44.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	69.89%	15.47%	+54.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	69.64%	20.02%	+49.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	69.64%	19.61%	+50.03%

NFLU vs. XDQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFLU has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than XDQQ's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

NFLU vs. XDQQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither NFLU nor XDQQ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NFLU and XDQQ in my portfolio?

NFLU and XDQQ have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NFLU or XDQQ?

NFLU has higher volatility (23.16%) compared to XDQQ (7.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLU dropped -80.45% vs XDQQ's -35.63%.

Which ETF is better, NFLU or XDQQ?

On 1-year performance, XDQQ leads with 8.25% vs -70.21% for NFLU. On fees, XDQQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XDQQ has been the lower-risk option at 7.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NFLU or XDQQ?

Over the 1-year period, XDQQ has performed better with a 8.25% return vs -70.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NFLU or XDQQ?

XDQQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NFLU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NFLU or XDQQ?

NFLU and XDQQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between NFLU and XDQQ?

They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for NFLU and 0.79% for XDQQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XDQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.43 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.