NFLU vs. NBIG

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

NFLU (T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF) and NBIG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their -0.07 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. NFLU charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NBIG.

Performance

NFLU vs. NBIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFLU achieves a -50.09% return, which is significantly lower than NBIG's 126.41% return.

NFLU

• 1D: -4.37%
• 1M: -16.63%
• 6M: -36.31%
• YTD: -50.09%
• 1Y: -70.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -20.46%

NBIG

• 1D: 1.96%
• 1M: -36.58%
• 6M: 133.65%
• YTD: 126.41%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF	$50.87M	$45.72M	$37.32M
NFLU T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF	$3.54M	$5.25M	$4.46M

NFLU vs. NBIG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NFLU T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF	-50.09%	-29.59%
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF	126.41%	-59.80%

Correlation

The correlation between NFLU and NBIG is -0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025	-0.07

Return for Risk

NFLU vs. NBIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NFLU

NFLU Risk / Return Rank: 1
NFLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
NFLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
NFLU Omega Ratio Rank: 1
NFLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
NFLU Martin Ratio Rank: 1

NBIG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NFLU vs. NBIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NFLU	NBIG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.01	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.82	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.77	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.91	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.44	—	—

Drawdowns

NFLU vs. NBIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFLU drawdown since its inception was -80.45%, roughly equal to the maximum NBIG drawdown of -78.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLU and NBIG.

Drawdown Indicators

	NFLU	NBIG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.45%	-78.77%	-1.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-77.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-78.21%	-66.61%	-11.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.00%	-42.08%	+10.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	48.81%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NFLU	NBIG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.16%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	55.99%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	69.89%	218.72%	-148.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	69.64%	218.72%	-149.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	69.64%	218.72%	-149.08%

NFLU vs. NBIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFLU has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than NBIG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

NFLU vs. NBIG - Dividend Comparison

Neither NFLU nor NBIG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NFLU and NBIG in my portfolio?

NFLU and NBIG have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NFLU or NBIG?

On fees, NBIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NFLU or NBIG?

NBIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NFLU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NFLU or NBIG?

NFLU and NBIG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between NFLU and NBIG?

They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for NFLU and 0.75% for NBIG.