NFLU vs. FUTG
NFLU (T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF) and FUTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NFLU charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FUTG.
Performance
NFLU vs. FUTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFLU achieves a -32.09% return, which is significantly higher than FUTG's -75.86% return.
NFLU
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -15.11%
- YTD
- -32.09%
- 6M
- -44.93%
- 1Y
- -65.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FUTG
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- -71.11%
- YTD
- -75.86%
- 6M
- -77.93%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NFLU vs. FUTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NFLU T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF | -32.09% | -43.88% |
FUTG Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF | -75.86% | -0.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFLU and FUTG is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFLU vs. FUTG — Risk / Return Rank
NFLU
FUTG
NFLU vs. FUTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF (FUTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NFLU | FUTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.91 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.41 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NFLU | FUTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.99 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.10 | -0.66 | +0.57 |
Drawdowns
NFLU vs. FUTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFLU drawdown since its inception was -72.10%, smaller than the maximum FUTG drawdown of -86.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLU and FUTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFLU | FUTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.10% | -86.19% | +14.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.35% | -84.51% | +14.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.02% | -40.62% | +12.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.49% | — | — |
Volatility
NFLU vs. FUTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFLU | FUTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.19% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.31% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.63% | 135.59% | -68.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.10% | 135.59% | -66.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.10% | 135.59% | -66.49% |
NFLU vs. FUTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NFLU has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FUTG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
NFLU vs. FUTG - Dividend Comparison
Neither NFLU nor FUTG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NFLU and FUTG have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FUTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FUTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NFLU.
NFLU and FUTG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for NFLU and 0.75% for FUTG.
Find the right allocation for NFLU and FUTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer