NFLU vs. COII
NFLU (T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF) and COII (REX COIN Growth & Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NFLU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by REX Shares, while COII is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by REX Shares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NFLU returned -65.71% vs -53.61% for COII. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NFLU charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for COII.
Performance
NFLU vs. COII - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFLU achieves a -32.09% return, which is significantly higher than COII's -37.40% return.
NFLU
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -15.11%
- YTD
- -32.09%
- 6M
- -44.93%
- 1Y
- -65.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COII
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -17.30%
- YTD
- -37.40%
- 6M
- -48.49%
- 1Y
- -53.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NFLU vs. COII - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NFLU T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF | -32.09% | -49.51% |
COII REX COIN Growth & Income ETF | -37.40% | -25.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFLU and COII is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFLU vs. COII — Risk / Return Rank
NFLU
COII
NFLU vs. COII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU) and REX COIN Growth & Income ETF (COII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NFLU | COII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.91 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.41 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NFLU | COII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.99 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.10 | -0.79 | +0.69 |
Drawdowns
NFLU vs. COII - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFLU drawdown since its inception was -72.10%, roughly equal to the maximum COII drawdown of -72.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLU and COII.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFLU | COII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.10% | -72.22% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.10% | -72.22% | +0.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.35% | -68.84% | -1.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.02% | -39.23% | +11.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.49% | — | — |
Volatility
NFLU vs. COII - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFLU | COII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.19% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.31% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.63% | 68.35% | -1.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.10% | 68.35% | +0.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.10% | 68.35% | +0.75% |
NFLU vs. COII - Expense Ratio Comparison
NFLU has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than COII's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
NFLU vs. COII - Dividend Comparison
NFLU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 91.86%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
COII REX COIN Growth & Income ETF | 91.86% | 41.52% |
NFLU T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NFLU and COII have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, COII leads with -53.61% vs -65.71% for NFLU. On fees, COII is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, COII has performed better with a -53.61% return vs -65.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COII is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NFLU.
COII has the higher dividend yield at 91.86%, compared with 0.00% for NFLU.
NFLU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while COII is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for NFLU and 0.99% for COII.
Find the right allocation for NFLU and COII
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer