PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NFLU vs. CBRG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NFLU vs. CBRG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CBRS Daily ETF (CBRG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NFLU

1D
-5.47%
1M
-18.45%
6M
-41.32%
YTD
-46.73%
1Y
-73.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CBRG

1D
16.78%
1M
-14.12%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFLU vs. CBRG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NFLU and CBRG is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2026

0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NFLU vs. CBRG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFLU
NFLU Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
NFLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLU Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLU Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

CBRG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFLU vs. CBRG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CBRS Daily ETF (CBRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NFLUCBRGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.75

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.53

NFLU vs. CBRG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NFLU vs. CBRG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFLU drawdown since its inception was -77.98%, roughly equal to the maximum CBRG drawdown of -74.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLU and CBRG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NFLUCBRGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.98%

-74.80%

-3.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-75.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-76.75%

-62.13%

-14.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.44%

-17.88%

-12.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

47.75%

Volatility

NFLU vs. CBRG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NFLUCBRGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.21%

156.15%

-86.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

69.41%

156.15%

-86.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.41%

156.15%

-86.74%

NFLU vs. CBRG - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFLU has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than CBRG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

NFLU vs. CBRG - Dividend Comparison

Neither NFLU nor CBRG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


NFLU and CBRG have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CBRG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBRG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NFLU.

NFLU and CBRG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for NFLU and 0.75% for CBRG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NFLU and CBRG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer