NFLU vs. BOEG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NFLU (T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF) and BOEG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NFLU charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BOEG.

Performance

NFLU vs. BOEG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF (BOEG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFLU achieves a -32.34% return, which is significantly lower than BOEG's -14.18% return.

NFLU

• 1D: -4.65%
• 1M: -21.10%
• YTD: -32.34%
• 6M: -45.65%
• 1Y: -64.65%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BOEG

• 1D: -6.30%
• 1M: -11.15%
• YTD: -14.18%
• 6M: -2.43%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFLU vs. BOEG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NFLU T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF	-32.34%	-46.98%
BOEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF	-14.18%	6.85%

Correlation

The correlation between NFLU and BOEG is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2025	0.23

Return for Risk

NFLU vs. BOEG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFLU

NFLU Risk / Return Rank: 1
NFLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
NFLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
NFLU Omega Ratio Rank: 1
NFLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
NFLU Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFLU vs. BOEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF (BOEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NFLU	BOEG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.97	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.63	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.79	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.90	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.40	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NFLU	BOEG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.97	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.10	-0.14	+0.04

Drawdowns

NFLU vs. BOEG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFLU drawdown since its inception was -72.10%, which is greater than BOEG's maximum drawdown of -46.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLU and BOEG.

Drawdown Indicators

	NFLU	BOEG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.10%	-46.47%	-25.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-72.10%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-70.46%	-35.57%	-34.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.92%	-19.06%	-8.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	46.27%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NFLU	BOEG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.50%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	51.32%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	66.63%	63.38%	+3.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	69.18%	63.38%	+5.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	69.18%	63.38%	+5.80%

NFLU vs. BOEG - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFLU has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than BOEG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

NFLU vs. BOEG - Dividend Comparison

Neither NFLU nor BOEG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NFLU and BOEG in my portfolio?

NFLU and BOEG have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NFLU or BOEG?

On fees, BOEG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NFLU or BOEG?

BOEG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NFLU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NFLU or BOEG?

NFLU and BOEG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between NFLU and BOEG?

They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for NFLU and 0.75% for BOEG.