PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NFLT vs. FLSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NFLT vs. FLSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF (NFLT) and Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFLT achieves a 1.82% return, which is significantly lower than FLSP's 1.97% return.


NFLT

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.81%
YTD
1.82%
6M
1.75%
1Y
7.05%
3Y*
7.44%
5Y*
3.14%
10Y*
4.06%

FLSP

1D
-0.36%
1M
0.59%
YTD
1.97%
6M
2.01%
1Y
14.58%
3Y*
10.33%
5Y*
8.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFLT vs. FLSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
NFLT
Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF
1.82%8.77%6.05%9.16%-9.49%1.18%8.02%0.08%
FLSP
Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF
1.97%15.56%11.75%3.14%0.44%11.44%-15.19%0.90%

Correlation

The correlation between NFLT and FLSP is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2019

-0.00

The correlation between NFLT and FLSP shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to -0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NFLT vs. FLSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFLT
NFLT Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
NFLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLT Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLT Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

FLSP
FLSP Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
FLSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLSP Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FLSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLSP Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFLT vs. FLSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF (NFLT) and Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NFLTFLSPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.28

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

3.63

-0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.71

10.82

+1.88

NFLT vs. FLSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFLT Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the FLSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFLT and FLSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NFLT vs. FLSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFLT drawdown since its inception was -15.17%, smaller than the maximum FLSP drawdown of -22.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLT and FLSP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NFLTFLSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.17%

-22.75%

+7.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.42%

-4.03%

+1.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.24%

-6.69%

+3.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.42%

-9.52%

-3.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-1.26%

+0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.09%

-6.26%

+4.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.56%

1.39%

-0.83%

Volatility

NFLT vs. FLSP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF (NFLT) is 1.56%, while Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP) has a volatility of 1.79%. This indicates that NFLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NFLTFLSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.56%

1.79%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.14%

6.78%

-3.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.19%

9.07%

-4.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.47%

13.35%

-8.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.94%

13.48%

-8.54%

NFLT vs. FLSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFLT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FLSP's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

NFLT vs. FLSP - Dividend Comparison

NFLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.49%, more than FLSP's 2.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLSP
Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF
2.60%2.65%1.18%1.19%2.18%1.19%8.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NFLT
Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF
5.49%5.74%5.76%6.02%4.16%3.41%3.63%4.33%4.81%6.23%5.30%0.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


NFLT and FLSP have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLSP has higher volatility (1.79%) compared to NFLT (1.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLT dropped -15.17% vs FLSP's -22.75%.

On 5-year performance, FLSP leads with 8.35% vs 3.14% for NFLT. On fees, NFLT is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, NFLT has been the lower-risk option at 1.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLSP has performed better with a 8.35% return vs 3.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NFLT is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FLSP.

NFLT has the higher dividend yield at 5.49%, compared with 2.60% for FLSP.

NFLT is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while FLSP is Long-Short. They also come from different issuers: Virtus and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for NFLT and 0.65% for FLSP.

NFLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NFLT and FLSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer