NFLT vs. FBND
NFLT (Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF) and FBND (Fidelity Total Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NFLT is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Virtus, while FBND is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, NFLT returned 4.09%/yr vs 2.54%/yr for FBND. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NFLT charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for FBND.
Performance
NFLT vs. FBND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFLT achieves a 1.75% return, which is significantly higher than FBND's 0.70% return. Over the past 10 years, NFLT has outperformed FBND with an annualized return of 4.09%, while FBND has yielded a comparatively lower 2.54% annualized return.
NFLT
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.75%
- 6M
- 2.23%
- 1Y
- 7.85%
- 3Y*
- 7.50%
- 5Y*
- 3.13%
- 10Y*
- 4.09%
FBND
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 0.70%
- 6M
- 1.04%
- 1Y
- 4.85%
- 3Y*
- 4.89%
- 5Y*
- 0.76%
- 10Y*
- 2.54%
NFLT vs. FBND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFLT Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF | 1.75% | 8.77% | 6.05% | 9.16% | -9.49% | 1.18% | 8.02% | 10.13% | -2.68% | 6.30% |
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 0.70% | 7.57% | 2.13% | 6.81% | -12.54% | -0.43% | 9.41% | 9.82% | -0.57% | 3.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFLT and FBND is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2015 | 0.45 |
The correlation between NFLT and FBND shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (all time) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
NFLT vs. FBND - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NFLT
FBND
Utilities
Financial Services
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
NFLT
FBND
Financial Services
NFLT
FBND
Healthcare
NFLT
FBND
-
Real Estate
NFLT
FBND
-
Technology
NFLT
FBND
-
Basic Materials
NFLT
-
FBND
-
Communication Services
NFLT
-
FBND
-
Consumer Cyclical
NFLT
-
FBND
-
Consumer Defensive
NFLT
-
FBND
-
Energy
NFLT
-
FBND
Industrials
NFLT
-
FBND
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFLT vs. FBND — Risk / Return Rank
NFLT
FBND
NFLT vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF (NFLT) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NFLT | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.22 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.26 | 1.83 | +1.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.29 | 5.32 | +8.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NFLT vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFLT drawdown since its inception was -15.17%, smaller than the maximum FBND drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLT and FBND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFLT | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.17% | -17.25% | +2.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.42% | -2.66% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.24% | -5.94% | +2.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.42% | -17.25% | +3.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.17% | -17.25% | +2.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.65% | -1.23% | +0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.10% | -3.34% | +1.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.55% | 0.91% | -0.36% |
Volatility
NFLT vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison
Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF (NFLT) has a higher volatility of 1.64% compared to Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) at 1.35%. This indicates that NFLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFLT | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.64% | 1.35% | +0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.12% | 2.81% | +0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.20% | 3.83% | +0.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.47% | 5.92% | -1.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.95% | 6.10% | -1.15% |
NFLT vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison
NFLT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
NFLT vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison
NFLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.48%, more than FBND's 4.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 4.69% | 4.70% | 4.73% | 4.26% | 3.07% | 1.86% | 4.25% | 2.90% | 2.93% | 2.56% | 2.84% | 3.26% |
NFLT Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF | 5.48% | 5.74% | 5.76% | 6.02% | 4.16% | 3.41% | 3.63% | 4.33% | 4.81% | 6.23% | 5.30% | 0.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NFLT and FBND have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NFLT has higher volatility (1.64%) compared to FBND (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLT dropped -15.17% vs FBND's -17.25%.
On 10-year performance, NFLT leads with 4.09% vs 2.54% for FBND. On fees, FBND is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, FBND has been the lower-risk option at 1.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, NFLT has performed better with a 4.09% return vs 2.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FBND is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for NFLT.
NFLT has the higher dividend yield at 5.48%, compared with 4.69% for FBND.
NFLT is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while FBND is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. They also come from different issuers: Virtus and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for NFLT and 0.36% for FBND.
NFLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NFLT and FBND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer