NFLT vs. ASGM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NFLT (Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF) and ASGM (Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NFLT is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Virtus, while ASGM is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Virtus. Both are actively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NFLT charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for ASGM.

Performance

NFLT vs. ASGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF (NFLT) and Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF (ASGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFLT achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than ASGM's 22.52% return.

NFLT

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 1.50%
• 6M: 1.58%
• 1Y: 7.11%
• 3Y*: 7.38%
• 5Y*: 3.15%
• 10Y*: 4.13%

ASGM

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 7.21%
• YTD: 22.52%
• 6M: 24.07%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFLT vs. ASGM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NFLT Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF	1.50%	3.17%
ASGM Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF	22.52%	11.57%

Correlation

The correlation between NFLT and ASGM is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2025	0.30

Return for Risk

NFLT vs. ASGM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFLT

NFLT Risk / Return Rank: 57
NFLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
NFLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
NFLT Omega Ratio Rank: 52
NFLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
NFLT Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFLT vs. ASGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF (NFLT) and Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF (ASGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NFLT	ASGM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.60	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.95	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.00	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NFLT	ASGM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.78	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.84	2.95	-2.10

Drawdowns

NFLT vs. ASGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFLT drawdown since its inception was -15.17%, which is greater than ASGM's maximum drawdown of -6.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLT and ASGM.

Drawdown Indicators

	NFLT	ASGM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.17%	-6.62%	-8.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.42%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.42%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-15.17%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.33%	-0.53%	+0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.10%	-1.22%	-0.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.55%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NFLT	ASGM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.19%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.90%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.01%	15.67%	-11.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.43%	15.67%	-11.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.93%	15.67%	-10.74%

NFLT vs. ASGM - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFLT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than ASGM's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

NFLT vs. ASGM - Dividend Comparison

NFLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.50%, more than ASGM's 3.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASGM Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF	3.69%	4.52%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NFLT Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF	5.50%	5.74%	5.76%	6.02%	4.16%	3.41%	3.63%	4.33%	4.81%	6.23%	5.30%	0.67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NFLT and ASGM in my portfolio?

NFLT and ASGM have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NFLT or ASGM?

On fees, NFLT is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NFLT or ASGM?

NFLT is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for ASGM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NFLT or ASGM?

NFLT has the higher dividend yield at 5.50%, compared with 3.69% for ASGM.

What is the main difference between NFLT and ASGM?

NFLT is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while ASGM is Tactical Allocation. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for NFLT and 0.86% for ASGM.